2023
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Induce Epigenetic Changes to Gametes and Embryos?

Abstract: Since the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, more than nine million children have been conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). While the great majority of children are healthy, there are concerns about the potential epigenetic consequences of gametes and embryo manipulation. In fact, during the preimplantation period, major waves of epigenetic reprogramming occur. Epigenetic reprogramming is susceptible to environmental changes induced by ovarian stimulation, in-vitro fertilization, and embryo c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, this difference is explained by the impact of the freezing medium with cryoprotectants used to limit the freezing damage. In fact, frozen embryos are preserved in a non-physiological storage fluid, and consequently, epigenetic changes in the embryo take place in order to withstand the hostile environment of the storage medium and freezing in liquid nitrogen [26]. In fresh embryo transfer, birthweight is more often below the third percentile [13], as confirmed by our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In the literature, this difference is explained by the impact of the freezing medium with cryoprotectants used to limit the freezing damage. In fact, frozen embryos are preserved in a non-physiological storage fluid, and consequently, epigenetic changes in the embryo take place in order to withstand the hostile environment of the storage medium and freezing in liquid nitrogen [26]. In fresh embryo transfer, birthweight is more often below the third percentile [13], as confirmed by our data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Cleavage-stage embryos can be frozen directly, while blastocysts need to be manually shrunk prior to vitrification. It remains unclear whether this difference will yield potential consequences for the birth weight of future offspring ( 30 , 31 ). Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility that the higher birth weight is due to a greater effect of the vitrification-thawing process itself on the blastocyst compared to the cleavage-stage embryo, and a randomized study of Day 3 versus Day 5/6 using fresh embryo transfer would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%