The monoamine theory of mood disorders has dominated psychiatric dogma for nearly 50 years. Recent findings about the role of brain peptides in the regulation of emotions and behavior challenge this over-simplified theory, and are about to open the door for a new era, focused on peptides as putative complementary drug targets in psychiatry. The development of improved animal models for depression would accelerate its arrival. Drug Dev. Res. 65:93-96, 2005. c 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: monoamines; vasopressin; corticotropin-releasing factor type-1 receptor; melanin-concentrating hormone receptors; neuropeptide Y; galanin; angiotensin; animal models; clinical trials; pharmacogenetics
MOVING RESEARCH FOCUS FROM MONOAMINES TOWARDS PEPTIDESPharmacotherapy for psychiatric disorders has been focused for several decades on the monoamines drug targets. The largest part of psychiatric drugs, with few exceptions, inhibits the action of monoamine receptors, monoamine synaptic transporters, and monoamine metabolizing enzymes. For psychiatric drug development, the focus on monoamine targets has been most remarkable for treating depression and anxiety disorders, the most common psychiatric disorders and among the largest healthcare burdens for modern societies. This ongoing trend is no surprise, keeping in mind that the monoamine theory of depression has dominated psychiatric thinking since the 1960s [Schildkraut, 1965;Coppen, 1967]. Indeed, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs), and mixed SSRI/NRI drugs have become among the leading profit makers for the pharmaceutical industry, second only to the statins, with US market sales of over US$ 6.2 billion annually [Phillips and Van Bebber, 2005]. Hence, it is not surprising that the drug industry is developing further monoamine reuptake inhibitors to replace those whose patents are nearing expiration [Walter, 2005]. After all, it is always less risky for investors to place their bets on the horse with the best winning records, even if this way prospects for true pharmacotherapeutic innovation are minimized. Evidently, current antidepressants are not that effective, with efficacy estimates for SSRIs being in the range of 14 to 18% improvement compared with placebo [ Moncrieff and Kirsch, 2005;Roose and Schatzberg, 2005]. This raises serious concerns over the cost-effectiveness of current antidepressants. Pharmacogenomics tools might potentially improve antidepressants' efficacy by allowing genotype-determined drug tailoring for the individual patient [Lee, 2005] but their promise is still far away from routine clinical use. Presently, in particular with respect to psychiatry, it seems that pharmacogenomics tools should primarily be aimed at improving drug safety profiles by reducing the alarmingly high rates of adverse drug reactions, estimated in a large UK study to account for about 6.5% of all new hospitalizations [Pirmohamed et al., 2004]. The emergent shift in molecular medicine from genotypes to epiph...