1995
DOI: 10.1016/0142-694x(94)00011-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments using normal participants doing relatively low-level tasks are informative about creative processes-even Einstein's creative processes (Amabile, 1990). The study of any designer, no matter how inexperienced, must tell us something about designing (Lloyd, Lawson, & Scott, 1995). For an expert designer the task may be relatively well-structured compared to a novice (Gero & McNeill, 1998;Voss & Post, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments using normal participants doing relatively low-level tasks are informative about creative processes-even Einstein's creative processes (Amabile, 1990). The study of any designer, no matter how inexperienced, must tell us something about designing (Lloyd, Lawson, & Scott, 1995). For an expert designer the task may be relatively well-structured compared to a novice (Gero & McNeill, 1998;Voss & Post, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier views of "the brief" (as opposed to briefing) have focused on the brief as a written document (Design Council, 2012) -in some cases given to the designer by the client (Lloyd, Lawson and Scott, 1997).…”
Section: Design and Briefingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review aimed to answer the following research question by synthesising the findings of individual studies: What is our current understanding of the cognitive processes involved in conceptual design tasks carried out by individual designers? We focused on protocol studies because unlike other empirical methods, protocol analysis is generally considered to provide direct access to a designer's cognitive processes [7,10]. Consequently, Cross [6] notes that the method "has become regarded as the most likely method (perhaps the only method) to bring out into the open the somewhat mysterious cognitive abilities of designers" (p.80).…”
Section: The Systematic Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%