2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2082965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can coffee improve image guidance?

Abstract: Anecdotally, surgeons sometimes observe large errors when using image guidance in endonasal surgery. We hypothesize that one contributing factor is the possibility that operating room personnel might accidentally bump the optically tracked rigid body attached to the patient after registration has been performed. In this paper we explore the registration error at the skull base that can be induced by simulated bumping of the rigid body, and find that large errors can occur when simulated bumps are applied to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be possible to adapt the basic granular jamming technique to an alternate form factor (see e.g. [15,18]), but further research will be required to assess the feasibility of doing so. Additionally, we note that the device is compatible with any patient, including those with long hair.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It may be possible to adapt the basic granular jamming technique to an alternate form factor (see e.g. [15,18]), but further research will be required to assess the feasibility of doing so. Additionally, we note that the device is compatible with any patient, including those with long hair.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, surgeons report that there is an ongoing loss of neuronavigation accuracy after initial registration due to multiple different factors [14]; therefore, ensuring accurate registration throughout the entire procedure is important. Even in “good” cases, the average TRE observed by the authors was approximately 2 mm, which is larger than one would expect from a theoretical perspective, based on the patient-fiducial geometry and typical brow scan point collection error [18]. However, this level of error is easily explainable when one considers relative motion between the fiducial markers and the patient’s skull.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During anterior segment ophthalmic surgery, for example, involuntary patient head motion can be as much as 11 mm [3]. Most researches that aim to mitigate head movement had focused on how to constraint the head, with examples such as the head fixation device for iRAM!S robot [4] and the Granular-Jamming Headband [5]. On the other hand, other approaches, such as countering head motion, were rarely explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%