2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can child-pedestrians’ hazard perception skills be enhanced?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the differences in crossing percentages as a function of speed pattern are regard to be as a quite relevant conclusion. Contrary to other studies that usually assume constant speed (e.g., [19,20,22,[26][27][28][29]), this study showed that the speed pattern is a relevant factor of crossing decision-making and should be a variable of interest in pedestrian simulator studies. Future work should complement this approach with other vehicle approaching patterns.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the differences in crossing percentages as a function of speed pattern are regard to be as a quite relevant conclusion. Contrary to other studies that usually assume constant speed (e.g., [19,20,22,[26][27][28][29]), this study showed that the speed pattern is a relevant factor of crossing decision-making and should be a variable of interest in pedestrian simulator studies. Future work should complement this approach with other vehicle approaching patterns.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…These values (Table 1) were used as a reference to define the vehicles' trajectories to be used in the simulator. Contrary to other studies that usually assume constant speed (e.g., [19,20,22,[26][27][28][29]), the three types of speed profiles recorded in the observational study were implemented in the simulator. Speeds above 30 km/h were not considered since the study intended to evaluate the pedestrians' crossing decision-making, considering the approach of a vehicle at short distances from the crosswalk.…”
Section: Virtual Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to coordinate eyesight and hearing is also limited in children which results in missing dangerous situations thereby increasing the risk of traffic accidents [8]. Other than the physical disadvantages the major reasons of children overinvolvement in traffic accidents include behavioral factors, such as, their lack of ability to scan the environment properly for threats, inconsistency in behavior and in judgment inherent in young age groups [9], inattention [10], distraction (playing, talking, mobile phone use) in traffic situations, ability to estimate speed and distance, and less developed hazard perception skills [11][12][13][14]. Lack of maturity in behavioral and physical abilities limit the capacity of children to evaluate risk and make them more susceptible to crashes in traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a child is aware of the existence of incorrect second order beliefs, he or she can draw conclusions as to the reasons for these (Astington, Pelletier, & Homer, 2002) 7 years: distinction between left and right possible (Limbourg & Senckel, 1976) 7-8 years: hazard perception is based on the existence of certain objects (e.g. a large car), while the object's surroundings are ignored (Underwood, Dillon, Farnsworth, & Twiner, 2007) 7-8 years: while hazard perception is still rather idiosyncratic and self-centred at the age of 7-8, in older children (11-12 years) this changes to a more global perspective on traffic events (Underwood et al, 2007) 7-9 years: children react less often to potential dangers (Meir, Oron-Gilad, & Parmet, 2015a, 2015b 7-8 years: when organizing images of traffic situations based on their own safety criteria, 7 to 8-year-olds demonstrate a very individual, special perspective compared to the overall, integrated perspective of the older children (Underwood et al, 2007) 7-9 years: children can be trained in hazard perception as pedestrians: children who had undergone training recognised possible dangers related to a restricted field of vision more often than those in the control group (Meir et al, 2015a) 7-9 years: 7 to 9-year-old children recognised fewer situations (restricted field of vision due to parked cars) as dangerous compared to older children and adults (Meir, et al, 2015b) 7-10 years: 7 to 9-year-old children and 9 to 10-year-old children recognised fewer situations (restricted field of vision due to a bend in the road) as dangerous compared to adults; 10 to 13-year-olds scored significantly better here than 7 to 9-year olds (Meir et al, 2015b) 7-10 years: in a virtual study, it was possible to show that children increase their speed when crossing the road as soon as the traffic conditions become more risky (Morrongiello, Corbett, Milanovic, Pyne, & Vierich, 2015) 7-11 years: the ability to predict the driver's intention correctly improves significantly with increasing age (Foot et al, 2006) 7-13 years: In both 7 to 13-year-old children and adults, crossing the road is negatively affected by mobile phone communication. Influence of age: adults scored significantly better, followed by 11 to 13-year-olds.…”
Section: -6 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%