2021
DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can anesthetic effects and pain treatment influence the long-term prognosis of early-stage lymph node-negative breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery?

Abstract: Background: Breast cancer is currently the leading cause of women's death. It is crucial to further improve the approach to treatment and the long-term survival rate of breast cancer patients, and to reduce the rates of recurrence and metastasis. It has been reported that the possibility of tumor metastasis depends on the metastatic potential of the tumor and the host defense against tumor metastasis, in which cellular immunity and the function of natural killer (NK) cells are critical to maintaining this bala… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same result was found in the subgroup analysis of EIP. Our results from the comprehensive meta-analysis coincided with most, even not all, results from recently reported studies [ 5 , 19 ]. According to the COX regression analysis of included studies, the long-term prognosis of ovarian cancer patients after surgery was also related to tumor stage, whether the tumor reduction operation was complete, as showed up the outcomes part.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The same result was found in the subgroup analysis of EIP. Our results from the comprehensive meta-analysis coincided with most, even not all, results from recently reported studies [ 5 , 19 ]. According to the COX regression analysis of included studies, the long-term prognosis of ovarian cancer patients after surgery was also related to tumor stage, whether the tumor reduction operation was complete, as showed up the outcomes part.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Then, 5233 kinds of literature were excluded after reviewing the title or abstract. After retrieving 44 full-length articles, ultimately, 27 studies [2,3,5,[11][12][13][14][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. Besides, five studies [4,[43][44][45][46] were in our meta-analysis by manual search.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was originally hypothesized that use of regional anaesthesia-analgesia reduced the risk of cancer recurrence [1,2], perhaps by reducing opioid requirements or preserving antitumour effects of the innate immune system through suppression of the stress response [3]. Although retrospective studies continue to be published reporting the association between neuraxial or regional anaesthesia and apparently beneficial cancer outcomes [19,20], level I evidence refutes this hypothesis. The first major RCT examining anaesthesia and cancer recurrence compared a combined paravertebral regional anaesthesia-propofol technique to a volatile-opioid technique in more than 2100 women undergoing breast cancer surgery and detected no difference in recurrence or disease-free survival [18].…”
Section: Does Regional Anaesthesia Affect Cancer Outcomes?mentioning
confidence: 99%