1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4371(96)00109-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can analysis of word frequency distinguish between writings of different authors?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [56], Meyer argues that on close inspection such claims turn out to be highly problematic, both on linguistic and on sciencetheoretical grounds. It has also been argued that it is possible to discriminate between human writings [57] and stochastic versions of texts precisely by looking at statistical properties of words. In contrast I argue here above that this statement can be extended to sentence statistics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [56], Meyer argues that on close inspection such claims turn out to be highly problematic, both on linguistic and on sciencetheoretical grounds. It has also been argued that it is possible to discriminate between human writings [57] and stochastic versions of texts precisely by looking at statistical properties of words. In contrast I argue here above that this statement can be extended to sentence statistics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it has been argued that it is possible to discriminate between human writings [71] and stochastic versions of texts precisely by looking at statistical properties of words that fall where Eq. (1) does not hold [20].…”
Section: Zipf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is exploratory rather than hypothesis testing: to find out how word use in academic Web spaces differs from that in standard written English. Although word frequency analyses are capable of giving directly useful results (e.g., Boynton, Glanville, McDaid, & Lefebvre, 1998; Leydesdorff & Curran, 2000; Lindsay & Gordon, 1999; Oakes, 1998; Rousseau, 1999; Sanderson & van Rijsbergen, 1999; Vilensky, 1998), the primary aim of our research is to aid text‐based data cleansing. A second use is in building intuition for future scientific Web intelligence applications: Knowledge of the words used in academic Webs will suggest the kinds of information that can be extracted and perhaps also the problems that are likely to be encountered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%