2017
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can an observational pain assessment tool improve time to analgesia for cognitively impaired older persons? A cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Objective The primary objective of the study was to measure the impact of an observational pain assessment dementia tool on time from ED arrival to first dose of analgesic medicine. Methods A multisite cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted to test the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) tool. Patients aged 65 years or older suspected of a long bone fracture were screened for cognitive impairment using the Six-Item Screening (SIS) tool. Patients scoring 4 or less on SIS (intervention sites… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pain scores were recorded, by nursing staff blinded to the block allocation, immediately prior to the delivery of the blocks and at 20 min post‐administration of the final block. For participants with cognitive impairment who could not provide their own verbal pain score out of 10, the PAINAD scale was used to measure pain providing a comparable score to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale from 0 to 10 . The cognitive function of participants was assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Abbreviated Mental Test 4 (AMT‐4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pain scores were recorded, by nursing staff blinded to the block allocation, immediately prior to the delivery of the blocks and at 20 min post‐administration of the final block. For participants with cognitive impairment who could not provide their own verbal pain score out of 10, the PAINAD scale was used to measure pain providing a comparable score to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale from 0 to 10 . The cognitive function of participants was assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Abbreviated Mental Test 4 (AMT‐4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For participants with cognitive impairment who could not provide their own verbal pain score out of 10, the PAINAD scale was used to measure pain providing a comparable score to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale from 0 to 10. 23 The cognitive function of participants was assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Abbreviated Mental Test 4 (AMT-4). Demographic data was also collected on participants including age and gender.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten articles were excluded because the intervention did not focus on nurses or other health professionals to improve pain assessment and management in dementia care. One article (Fry et al., 2018) studied people with cognitive impairment; however, the intervention was for the population of people living with dementia. The article, assessed according to the inclusion criteria, was included after discussion by authors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018). Pain reduction was measured postintervention (Chen & Lin, 2016; Fry et al., 2018; Liu & Lai, 2017; Pieper et al., 2018; Rostad et al., 2018; Sandvik et al., 2014), including reduction in pain‐related behaviours (Chen & Lin, 2016; Liu & Lai, 2017; Pieper et al., 2018) and reduction in dementia‐related agitation (Chen & Lin, 2016; Rostad et al., 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a qualitative study, PAINAD was found by ED nurses to be preferable to other observational pain assessment tools like Abbey pain scale, Doloplus 2 and pain assessment check list for seniors with limited ability to communicate 49 . PAINAD is quick and simple to use, gives a score out of 10 and assesses both physiological and psychological pain sequelae 50 …”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%