2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a regionalized model parameterisation be improved with a limited number of runoff measurements?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(69 reference statements)
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They therefore provided information for the regionalization at a time when dominant runoff processes were active. These results are comparable to those of Viviroli and Seibert (), who reported that discharge observations during the snowmelt and ice melt season were most valuable for informing regionalization in snow‐dominated or glaciated catchments. They furthermore showed that more observations were needed to effectively inform regionalization for catchments with a predominantly pluvial regime because of the randomness of rain events between and within years as opposed to the reoccurring process of snowmelt and ice melt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They therefore provided information for the regionalization at a time when dominant runoff processes were active. These results are comparable to those of Viviroli and Seibert (), who reported that discharge observations during the snowmelt and ice melt season were most valuable for informing regionalization in snow‐dominated or glaciated catchments. They furthermore showed that more observations were needed to effectively inform regionalization for catchments with a predominantly pluvial regime because of the randomness of rain events between and within years as opposed to the reoccurring process of snowmelt and ice melt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The result that a limited number of discharge observations can improve predictions in otherwise ungauged catchments is in agreement with Rojas‐Serna et al () and Viviroli and Seibert (), who concluded that a few randomly selected discharge observations or a few observations during mean‐flow conditions proved to be a valuable source of information beyond classical regionalization. The value of such observations for regionalization was generally higher for the attribute‐similarity‐based approach than for the spatial proximity approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In operational conditions, it is likely that the choice of gauging conditions is not made at random, and that the efficiency of the method could be improved by appropriate gauging strategies. Several authors attempted to define strategies for acquiring point flow data in a modeling perspective [see e.g., Clausen , ; Juston et al ., ; Konz and Seibert , ; Singh and Bardossy , ; Viviroli and Seibert , ]. This could also be investigated in the context of the approach proposed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the number of catchments is large, this does not prevent obtaining robust results. More advanced sampling strategies could be adopted to improve modeling efficiency [Viviroli and Seibert, 2015], but this was not within the scope of this article. Capacity of the production store (mm; positive) X G2…”
Section: Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the uncertainty introduced by regionalization, many researchers have tried to improve parameter estimation by introducing limited information from ungauged basins. For example, Viviroli and Seibert (2015) combined short-term streamflow observations with parameter regionalization and showed that parameter identifications could be improved compared with using information only from donor basins. Many recent works have tried to use available in situ or remote sensing observations of hydrological processes other than streamflow for model calibration, e.g., soil moisture (e.g., Silvestro et al, 2015;Vrugt et al, 2002), evapotranspiration (Vervoort et al, 2014;Winsemius et al, 2008), and groundwater level (e.g., Khu et al, 2008), as a new direction to solve the calibration problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%