2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Negative D-dimer Result Rule Out Acute Aortic Dissection?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the sensitivity and NPV of D-dimer are very good, D-dimer may overlook AAD46. False negative D-dimer are often observed for a young population, short dissection length, and thrombosed false lumen1117.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the sensitivity and NPV of D-dimer are very good, D-dimer may overlook AAD46. False negative D-dimer are often observed for a young population, short dissection length, and thrombosed false lumen1117.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, available data have clearly established that DD represents a highly sensitive and largely unspecific biomarker of AD. If associated with a sufficiently low pretest probability of AD (as established by validated clinical prediction rules), a negative DD could therefore reliably and safely ruleout AD [45]. Instead, available data indicate that DD is less sensitive (90%) for the diagnosis of aortic intramural aortic hematoma, probably due to the limited communication of the core lesion with the true aortic lumen [46].…”
Section: Coagulation and Inflammation Markers D-dimermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further research may clarify this issue [Song 2011]. The role of biomarkers, eg, D-dimer, in the diagnosis of aortic dissection is still controversial, and their role in diagnosing IMH is even less clear [Evangelista 2005;Brown 2011;Citro 2011].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%