Since analytic aesthetics began, around fifty years ago, music has perhaps been the art most discussed by philosophers. This interest is reflected even in the contents of this volume, with three chapters devoted to specifically musical issues, with other arts getting at most one chapter to themselves. The reasons for philosophers' attraction to music as a subject are obscure, but one element is surely that music, as a non-verbal, multipleinstance, performance art, raises at least as many questions about expression, ontology, interpretation, and value as any other art -questions that often seem more puzzling than those raised by other arts.Musical ontology -the study of the kinds of musical things there are, and the relations that hold between them -has been discussed for as long as any other topic in analytic philosophy of music, placed center-stage by Nelson Goodman's discussion in Art (1968). Amie Thomasson has recently pointed out that the number of 2 proposals offered for the ontology of art in general seems rather an embarrassment of riches (2005: 221), and this observation certainly holds for musical ontology in particular.
Languages of