2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
29

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(64 reference statements)
3
61
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the implementation of fsQCA, researchers convert all variables into sets. A set represents the degree of membership in a specific category/condition (Berbegal-Mirabent et al, 2015;Woodside, 2013). FsQCA enables researchers to test for fuzzy-set membership in an outcome condition for all possible combinations of the antecedent factors (for a detailed exposition of the technique, see Skarmeas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Configurational Versus Correlational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the implementation of fsQCA, researchers convert all variables into sets. A set represents the degree of membership in a specific category/condition (Berbegal-Mirabent et al, 2015;Woodside, 2013). FsQCA enables researchers to test for fuzzy-set membership in an outcome condition for all possible combinations of the antecedent factors (for a detailed exposition of the technique, see Skarmeas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Configurational Versus Correlational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare scholars focusing on either pure basic or pure applied research with those balancing between research and application, we focus on a sample of scholars from the natural sciences and engineering working at three leading European Universities of Sciences. These scholars are arguably particularly attractive partners for technology transfer (Berbegal-Mirabent et al 2015) and hence, should yield enough ambidextrous scholars to juxtapose the supposed trade-offs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model the spin-out company is created with no core propriety technology on, so the company is launched to generate revenue for the development of internal research and development (R&D) infrastructure, which will then lead to new marketable inventions. In recent times, Berbegal-Mirabent et al (2015) looked at factors that explain the creation of university spin-out companies by focusing on mechanisms that technology transfer offices (TTOs) and universities employ. These mechanisms include technology transfer activities that support spin-outs, normative frameworks, support infrastructures such as business incubators and science parks.…”
Section: Figure 1: the Entrepreneurial Process Of Spin-out Company Crmentioning
confidence: 99%