2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Checklist Reduce SOS Errors in Chest Radiography?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This experiment was performed using 57 radiographic examinations of the chest that had been used in earlier SOS studies [1,3,16,17]. Thirty cases had diverse, subtle, and clinically important native abnormalities, and 27 had no native abnormalities.…”
Section: Case Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experiment was performed using 57 radiographic examinations of the chest that had been used in earlier SOS studies [1,3,16,17]. Thirty cases had diverse, subtle, and clinically important native abnormalities, and 27 had no native abnormalities.…”
Section: Case Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach involves making an initial hypothesis prior to making observations that are directed to address the hypothesis [14,15]. This method would include a nondirected or free search approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, fixating on the potential abnormality allows the viewer to interpret the data to determine whether or not it is a negative or positive finding [22]. Detection errors have been reported to occur at any level along the visual search process and may be affected by method of search [14,15,23,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…second nodule visible at the chest radiograph [11]. That human factor limitation can be handled with double reading [12]. Unfortunately, none of the current CAD systems deal with the SOS effect [13], so a second expert observer is normally required for double reading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%