2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05217-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT predict pathological upgrading of prostate cancer from MRI-targeted biopsy to radical prostatectomy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among patients with pathological upgrading in training cohort, 51.6% of them are ISUP Grade 1, 20.3% to ISUP Grade 2, 20.3% to ISUP Grade 3, and 7.8% to ISUP Grade 4. This phenomenon has also been described in previous studies 26,33 . In our study, the difference between ISUP1 and ISUP4 ( p = 0.011) was statistically significant, while the difference between ISUP2 and ISUP4 ( p = 0.488), ISUP3 and ISUP4 ( p = 0.443) was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among patients with pathological upgrading in training cohort, 51.6% of them are ISUP Grade 1, 20.3% to ISUP Grade 2, 20.3% to ISUP Grade 3, and 7.8% to ISUP Grade 4. This phenomenon has also been described in previous studies 26,33 . In our study, the difference between ISUP1 and ISUP4 ( p = 0.011) was statistically significant, while the difference between ISUP2 and ISUP4 ( p = 0.488), ISUP3 and ISUP4 ( p = 0.443) was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This phenomenon has also been described in previous studies. 26,33 In our study, the difference between ISUP1 and ISUP4 (p = 0.011) was statistically significant, while the difference between ISUP2 and ISUP4 (p = 0.488), ISUP3 and ISUP4 (p = 0.443) was not statistically significant. The contribution of ISUP2 and ISUP3 to predicting pathological upgrading is very close.…”
Section: (A) (B)contrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, upgrade rates for patients with PIRADS‐5 or PIRADS‐4 index lesions (78% and 74%) were also significantly higher than cases with PIRADS‐ ≤ 3 index lesions (38%). Despite these promising results, upgrading from biopsy to RP is commonly observed in MRI‐targeted fusion biopsies especially in patients with GG1 disease at needle biopsy 3,11 . In this study, patients with a PIRADS score >3 were found to be more likely to upgrade in univariate analysis, but the PIRADS score was not found to be an independent predictor of upgrading in multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This may further explain why there was no significant difference in 68 Ga-PSMA PET positivity between patients with GS ≤ 7 and GS ≥ 8 PCa 43 . This may partly explain why a higher SUV max value can be used for the prediction of pathological upgrading, especially for patients with a lower tumor grade at mpMRI targeted biopsy 44 . In summary, an SUV max cutoff value can be identified to discriminate patients with csPCa from those with BPD because the jump in PSMA expression mainly exists between patients with GS = 7 csPCa and BPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%