“…In this regards, targeted DDSs are developed to circumvent these side effects, which can directly reach and penetrate into the tumors. They significantly reduce drug dose compared with the oral method, which can reduce the damage to vital cells and tissues markedly and minimize harm to normal organs. , APA is usually administrated orally, but the induced complications such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome limit the continual use of the drug. , The oral dose is 10–20 times higher than intravenous injection, thus causing strong drug resistance. − In this regard, the APA is loaded in nanoparticles, liposomes, lipids, peptide nucleic acids, or micelles to realize intravenous injection in most recent works. , In these noninvasive systems, the structures of the carriers are disrupted by the acidic and anaerobic tumor microenvironment to passively release drugs in a relatively short time, which cannot control the drug release rate strictly. Other implants, such as hydrogels and scaffolds, can control the drug release by infrared light or the tumor microenvironment. ,− In addition, the hydrogel scaffolds can also help with tissue reparation especially in breast cancer. , However, the nonspecific hydrogel systems are characterized by low drug loading ability, unwanted drug leakage, limited biocompatibility, and severe drug resistance.…”