2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Campylobacter jejuni contamination of broiler carcasses: Population dynamics and genetic profiles at slaughterhouse level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These bacteria such as Campylobacter (Gruntar et al . ) and Salmonella (Rasschaert et al . ) can be pathogenic, which must be controlled/eliminated to ensure product safety (Alvarez‐Astorga et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These bacteria such as Campylobacter (Gruntar et al . ) and Salmonella (Rasschaert et al . ) can be pathogenic, which must be controlled/eliminated to ensure product safety (Alvarez‐Astorga et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, despite improved hygiene and regulations in slaughterhouses and processing plants, raw chicken skin is still often contaminated with bacteria. These bacteria such as Campylobacter (Gruntar et al 2015) and Salmonella (Rasschaert et al 2008) can be pathogenic, which must be controlled/eliminated to ensure product safety (Alvarez-Astorga et al 2002), and can be influenced by storage conditions (Chaillou et al 2015). The effects of temperature on bacterial diversity was significant (Li 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posteriormente, cuando el ave infectada es llevada a matadero, el microorganismo puede pasar desde los intestinos a la musculatura, en el proceso de la evisceración, contaminando la carne (Silva et al, 2011;Riley et al, 2015;Zendehbad et al, 2015). Sin embargo, en un estudio para determinar el nivel de contaminación en canales de pollos broiler con C. jejuni, realizado por Gruntar et al (2015), se detectó una mayor contaminación en la fase posterior al desplume, lo que sugiere que la contaminación más importante se produce antes de la entrada a la sala de evisceración, debido a la corta duración de la fase de escaldado (a 54°C) y la consecuente sobrevivencia de especies de Campylobacter en la canal, posterior al desplume. Aunque todas las especies de aves de consumo pueden contener Campylobacter spp., el riesgo de transmisión alimentaria es mayor en el pollo, debido a las grandes cantidades comercializadas por la industria avícola (CDC, 2014;Marotta et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified
“…While the bacterium ideally grows between 37 and 42°C, storage at temperatures below 10°C stymies its proliferation. Three days of postprocessing refrigeration reduces Campylobacter by 2.94 log CFU/g, while exposure to freezing temperatures for the same duration can reduce Campylobacter load to 28 CFU/g (Gruntar, Biasizzo, Kušar, Pate, & Ocepek, ). Campylobacter may enter a nonreplicative viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state when exposed to these low temperatures.…”
Section: Retail Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refrigeration and freezing are further steps to reduce exposure to Campylobacter in the home (Hutchison et al, ; Lanier et al, ). On a personal level, thorough hand washing prior to and after handling raw chicken products can prevent the spread of bacteria, especially to “ready‐to‐eat” products such as salad (Gruntar et al, ; Higgins et al, ).…”
Section: Retail Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%