2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-019-09497-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Campus Connections: Student and Course Networks in Higher Education

Abstract: Residential higher education brings thousands of students together for multiple years and offers them an array of shared intellectual experiences and a network of social interactions. Many of these intellectual and social connections are formed during courses. Students are connected to students through courses they take together, and courses are connected to one another by students who take both. These courses and the students who take them form a bipartite network that encodes information about campus structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our hope is that this will provide a starting point for network epidemiologists who do wish to estimate a predictive model under different assumptions about R0 and other parameters. Second, we advance existing empirical knowledge of the social structure of higher education, using one university as a case study (see also Israel et al 2020). Third, and perhaps most critically, we provide relevant evidence to university leaders who must balance the benefits of face-to-face instruction against the potential risk it entails, and to the faculty, staff, parents, and students who are trying to understand these decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our hope is that this will provide a starting point for network epidemiologists who do wish to estimate a predictive model under different assumptions about R0 and other parameters. Second, we advance existing empirical knowledge of the social structure of higher education, using one university as a case study (see also Israel et al 2020). Third, and perhaps most critically, we provide relevant evidence to university leaders who must balance the benefits of face-to-face instruction against the potential risk it entails, and to the faculty, staff, parents, and students who are trying to understand these decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Network analysis has been used to interpret complex systems from multiple perspectives, ranging from social systems to shared knowledge networks (e.g., Aldrich 2015; Ouyang & Scharber 2017; Willcox & Huang 2017; Israel, Koester & McKay 2020; Huang & Willcox 2021). Applications of network analysis, which reveal the hidden features and relationships in higher education systems, have also been developed (Willcox & Huang 2017; Huang & Willcox 2021).…”
Section: Measuring Interdisciplinarity Using Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Willcox & Huang (2017) introduced an interactive curriculum map on the MIT university website () to help students create a solid curriculum path and browse similar or alternative classes. More recently, Israel et al (2020) investigated student and course networks in higher education to reveal campus connections.…”
Section: Measuring Interdisciplinarity Using Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also simulated the network with class size thresholds that would require a course to be taught virtually. A similar study was done in [13], on the 2019 Leaming Analytics Data Architecture data set out of the University of Michigan, with a focus on how important certain courses are in creating connectivity between students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extend the work in [13] and [21] by considering our small, stand-alone liberal arts college and include faculty data, athletics, ensembles, housing, and student organizations to create a person-to-group network and related person-to-person network. We also simulate virtual and hybrid courses, and the result of splitting the semester into two 7-week sessions, the latter of which has a significant impact on the network analysis results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%