2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camouflage in a dynamic world

Abstract: We review how animals conceal themselves in the face of the need to move, and how this is modulated by the dynamic components and rapidly varying illumination of natural backgrounds. We do so in a framework of minimising the viewer's signal-tonoise ratio. Motion can match that of the observer such that there is no relative motion cue, or mimic that of background objects (e.g. swaying leaves). For group-living animals, matched motion and coloration is a special case of the latter 'motion masquerade', where each… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also growing evidence, in relation to camouflage and concealment, to suggest that the visual noise of dynamic illumination, such as water caustics, could reduce the costs of organism movement (see [12][13][14][15]). This is analogous to the movement of background objects (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also growing evidence, in relation to camouflage and concealment, to suggest that the visual noise of dynamic illumination, such as water caustics, could reduce the costs of organism movement (see [12][13][14][15]). This is analogous to the movement of background objects (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QCPA could also be adapted to investigate moving patterns (e.g. Endler, ; Endler et al, ), given recent advances in the understanding of colour pattern functionality in the context of motion (Cuthill, Matchette, & Scott‐Samuel, ; Fleishman, ; Hughes, Troscianko, & Stevens, ; Murali, ; Nityananda et al, ; Ramos & Peters, ; Umeton, Tarawneh, Fezza, Read, & Rowe, ). There are types of visual information we have barely begun understanding, such as polarization vision, the use of fluorescence as well as their interaction with an animal's perception of colour and brightness (Foster et al, ; Marshall, Cortesi, de Busserolles, Siebeck, & Cheney, ; Marshall & Johnsen, ; Smithers, Roberts, & How, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a stick insect on a contrasting background has readily detectable features, so its survival depends on a misclassification by a predator at the stage of whole-object recognition (Skelhorn et al, 2010b). Motion similar to the mimicked object reduces discriminability (Bian, Elgar & Peters, 2016;Cuthill et al, 2019); dissimilar motion enhances discriminability. In some cases, it is not a minimization of signal that is effective, but an increase in noise, such as the creation of false edges in disruptive coloration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that motion breaks camouflage is therefore a significant constraint on activity, and the trade‐off between the camouflage‐breaking costs of motion and the benefits of being able to move is a major factor determining which anti‐predator defences evolve (Edmunds, ; Ruxton et al ., ). There are, however, some mitigating factors (Cuthill, Matchette & Scott‐Samuel, ). Motion of background objects such as foliage (Ord et al ., ; Peters, Hemmi & Zeil, ; New & Peters, ) or rapidly changing illumination (Matchette, Cuthill & Scott‐Samuel, ) can both mask movement.…”
Section: Constraints On Camouflagementioning
confidence: 99%