9th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icit.2006.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camouflage Defect Identification: A Novel Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This omission means that the confidence and extendibility of current models and metrics are low, falling short in ability to cope with high dynamic range (i.e. natural) (Bhajantri and Nagabhushan, 2006;Hecker, 1992;Sengottuvelan et al, 2008), semi-automatic labelling or tracking of the target (Chandesa et al, 2009), non-probabilistic and non-scalable distance metrics to high dimensional data or multiple observations given many images (Birkemark, 1999;Heinrich and Selj, 2015;Kiltie et al, 1995). Human behavioural data needs to be recorded to assess the coherence between human and model observers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This omission means that the confidence and extendibility of current models and metrics are low, falling short in ability to cope with high dynamic range (i.e. natural) (Bhajantri and Nagabhushan, 2006;Hecker, 1992;Sengottuvelan et al, 2008), semi-automatic labelling or tracking of the target (Chandesa et al, 2009), non-probabilistic and non-scalable distance metrics to high dimensional data or multiple observations given many images (Birkemark, 1999;Heinrich and Selj, 2015;Kiltie et al, 1995). Human behavioural data needs to be recorded to assess the coherence between human and model observers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhajantri and Nagabhushan 2 employed a grey level cooccurrence matrix to identify camouflaged defects within a small region of an image. 2 Gilmore et al 3 proposed a vision model and a way to use that model to compare different synthetic images to understand the factors affecting target conspicuity. 3 Muller presented a computer-aided method to assess camouflage in real-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neider and Zelinsky discussed in [29] the detection of camouflaged targets by looking through the distracters or by scrutinizing the target-similar background. In [3], Bhajantri and Nagabhushan proposed a technique to detect the camouflaged defect. Here, co-occurrence matrix-based texture features are computed within a small image region.…”
Section: Texture Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%