2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-014-9886-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camera System Resolution and its Influence on Digital Image Correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, a natural solution could be to use the camera to zoom into the region around the defect or perhaps to move the camera closer to the tapestry. Part of this investigation explores the merits and effectiveness of such a strategy; in particular, we examine how the loss of information associated with the zoomed tapestry image affects the uncertainty in the measured strain field …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, a natural solution could be to use the camera to zoom into the region around the defect or perhaps to move the camera closer to the tapestry. Part of this investigation explores the merits and effectiveness of such a strategy; in particular, we examine how the loss of information associated with the zoomed tapestry image affects the uncertainty in the measured strain field …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution was determined on endoscopic images of a USAF standard (USAF 1951, Thorlabs GmbH, Dachau, Germany) taken at distances of 3, 5, and 10 mm between the distal end of the endoscope and the target. Subsequent the smallest resolvable group and element number of the USAF-standard was identified and thereby the maximal resolvable lines per mm calculated 18,19 . To get information about the reproducibility of single-use ureteroscopes ten different devices were tested plus two reusable endoscopes.…”
Section: Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DIC method is inherently subjective. Numerous parameters affect the quality of DIC results, such as the lighting, the camera exposure (Zhu et al, 2018), the focal length (Reu et al, 2015), the surface pattern (Lecompte et al, 2006;Sutton et al, 2009;Reu et al, 2015), as well as the accuracy of the calibration.…”
Section: Digital Image Correlation (Dic)mentioning
confidence: 99%