The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1177/0278364913509675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camera-IMU-based localization: Observability analysis and consistency improvement

Abstract: This work investigates the relationship between system observability properties and estimator inconsistency for a Visionaided Inertial Navigation System (VINS). In particular, first we introduce a new methodology for determining the unobservable directions of nonlinear systems by factorizing the observability matrix according to the observable and unobservable modes. Subsequently, we apply this method to the VINS nonlinear model and determine its unobservable directions analytically. We leverage our analysis t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For smoother and more accurate pose estimation, we fuse this LiDAR-SLAM pose information with the IMU data via extended Kalman filtering (EKF). For this, following (Hesch et al 2014;Lee et al 2016), we utilize the IMU data (only accelerometer in (x, y) and yaw gyroscope used) for the EKF propagation step (with 250 Hz), while the LiDAR-SLAM data for the EKF measurement update (with 40 Hz). We also adopt the technique of error-state EKF for faster and more robust estimation performance (Hesch et al 2014).…”
Section: Ekf Pose Estimation Of Leader Wmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For smoother and more accurate pose estimation, we fuse this LiDAR-SLAM pose information with the IMU data via extended Kalman filtering (EKF). For this, following (Hesch et al 2014;Lee et al 2016), we utilize the IMU data (only accelerometer in (x, y) and yaw gyroscope used) for the EKF propagation step (with 250 Hz), while the LiDAR-SLAM data for the EKF measurement update (with 40 Hz). We also adopt the technique of error-state EKF for faster and more robust estimation performance (Hesch et al 2014).…”
Section: Ekf Pose Estimation Of Leader Wmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the control inputs are dependent on s (2) , s (3) , s (4) ,蠄, and蠄, and the dynamic system could be rewritten as a chain of integrators for each of the elements of Y with the appropriate derivative as the input to the flat system. For this reason, we plan trajectories that minimize the fourth derivative (i.e.…”
Section: B Image Features In a Fixed-orientation Virtual Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation using stereo cameras has proven to be effective [2], but requires heavy processing capabilities and a pair of calibrated cameras, which increases the weight and cost of the vehicle while decreasing the agility. Recent work has shown the feasibility of using a single monocular camera and an IMU for real-time localization [4]- [6] and autonomous flight [3], [7]- [9]. In these papers, information from the two sensors is fused using an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) or an Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) in order to provide localization that is viable for real-time control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented VINS observability analyses in [8][9][10]16,19,38] are among the most recent related works, which specifically study observability properties of the INS state variables for motion estimation in unknown environments. For instance, the analyses in [8,16] result in four unobservable directions, corresponding to global translations and global rotation about the gravity vector.…”
Section: Vins Observability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be challenging especially for high-dimensional systems, such as the VINS. To address this issue, in the following section we present the method of [5,9] for proving that a system is unobservable and finding its unobservable directions.…”
Section: Observability Analysis With Lie Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%