2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-014-0680-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camera-based eye blinks pattern detection for intelligent mouse

Abstract: Human-computer interface systems provide an alternative input modality to allow people with severe disabilities to access computer systems. One of the inexpensive and unobtrusive methods for this purpose is image-based eye blinks detection. Currently, available human-computer interface systems are often intrusive, limit in head rotation, require special hardware, and have special lighting or manual initialization. This paper presented a new robust method for real-time eye blinks detection. This method enables … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average accuracy of the other systems was greater than 90% with ITR greater than 56 bits/min. Some of these methods deliver a very high accuracy at a high transfer rate, but are too large and immobile for realistic wearable applications [67]- [72]. The system demonstrated by Graybill et al [73] involved developing smaller, more mobile, light insensitive and more inexpensive solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average accuracy of the other systems was greater than 90% with ITR greater than 56 bits/min. Some of these methods deliver a very high accuracy at a high transfer rate, but are too large and immobile for realistic wearable applications [67]- [72]. The system demonstrated by Graybill et al [73] involved developing smaller, more mobile, light insensitive and more inexpensive solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison Table 1 modified from Tanwear et al [44], compares seven eyeblink studies and two studies that detect brain activity for human computer interaction (HCI) [18], [36], [41], [45]- [50]. The table has two metrics that compares the performance of the different types of HCI devices, accuracy and ITR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the time still is considered slow and inaccurate when it comes to approaches that do not use brain signals, and also the need for electrodes connected to the head of the patient [ 47 , 54 , 64 ]. Other approaches to human–computer interaction systems that do not necessarily involve brain signals by EEG can be seen in Pinheiro et al [ 65 ], Hori et al [ 66 ], Fathi et al [ 67 ], Harezlak et al [ 68 ], Villanueva et al [ 69 ], Królak e Strumiłło [ 24 ], Zhao et al [ 70 ], Liu et al [ 71 ] and Aharonson et al [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%