“…Thereupon, the weight scores of the criteria are determined according to the objective or subjective weighting method to be used in the study. Unlike the previous studies found in the literature, i.e., Keçek and Cinser (2008), Ertuğrul and Karakaşoğlu (2009), Ustasüleyman (2009), Demireli (2010), Dai and Wang (2011), Uygurtürk and Korkmaz (2012), Bağcı and Rençber (2014) ), Mandic et al (2014), Çelen (2014a), Çelen (2014b), Saldanlı and Sırma (2014), Kandemir and Karataş (2016), Wanke et al (2016), Beheshtinia and Omidi (2017), Yıldırım and Demirci (2017), Gökmen Özkan (2017), Yamaltdinova (2017), Kalıntaş and Özarı (2019), Arslan (2019), Kendirli et al (2019), Karakaya (2019), Aydın (2020), Daver (2020), Kaygusuz et al (2020), Gökmen Özkan and Deliktaş (2020), Gülençer (2020), Sarı (2020), Tuba Özkan (2020), Yılmaz (2020), Gül (2021), Gülsün and Erdoğmuş (2021), Türegün (2022) , Baydas (2022), Wanke et al (2022), CRITIC-TOPSIS (CRT) was used in this study to calculate the performance scores of the banks, which are the subject of the research, in the pre-2019 and during 2020 year of COVID-19 and to obtain their ranking according to these scores, whereas Mean Weight-TOPSIS (MWT) and Entropy-TOPSIS (ENT) hybrid methods are applied separately.…”