2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5968-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement—correlations between alpha angle versus volumetric measurements and surgical findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DDH is an abnormality of the acetabulum, while FAI mostly affects the femoral head and neck. DDH is characterized by a static overload [2], while FAI is a painful, dynamic and early osseous conflict between proximal femur and the acetabulum which limits range of motion (ROM) [1,3,4]. Commonly used clinical tests for diagnosis have a low sensitivity and specificity [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDH is an abnormality of the acetabulum, while FAI mostly affects the femoral head and neck. DDH is characterized by a static overload [2], while FAI is a painful, dynamic and early osseous conflict between proximal femur and the acetabulum which limits range of motion (ROM) [1,3,4]. Commonly used clinical tests for diagnosis have a low sensitivity and specificity [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cam type is characterized by abnormal or aspheric morphology of the femoral head, pincer type is characterized by focal or global acetabular overcoverage, and mixed type has both cam and pincer characteristics. [1][2][3][4]7,8,[15][16][17][18][19]22,50 In general, the acetabular opening of the normal hip is anteversion in the axial plane. 33,39,42,43,52 Acetabular retroversion results in a prominent anterolateral edge of the acetabulum and potentially increases anterolateral coverage of the femoral head.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they showed that agreement between CT and MRI depended on the underlying deformity, observing greater discrepancies for alpha angles in Cam deformities and acetabular parameters in dysplasia. Dessouky et al report fair to moderate agreement for CT with manual segmentation in both interobserver analysis (ICC: 0.48-0.05) and intraobserver analysis (ICC: 0.49-0.24) [16]. At the same time Xia et al present a patient collective in which they measured alpha angles in different MRI sequences with a fully automated software, as well as manually, and measured good ICCs (anterosuperior 0.84, anterior 0.92) [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%