Volume 2: 30th Annual Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Parts a and B 2006
DOI: 10.1115/detc2006-99598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAM Size Optimization Based on a Fatigue Life Model

Abstract: The cam fatigue life of the translating roller-follower system is studied for polynomial and cycloidal displacement functions. The stress distribution in the contact zone between the cam and the roller-follower is determined by using a computer program. The “volume under risk” where the stress field is higher than the endurance limit is determined. Ioannides-Harris (IH) theory is used on the ‘volume under risk’ and the expected fatigue life is calculated. The effects of cam base circle radius, follower offset,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a common statistical fatigue life model, the L-P fatigue model is constantly modified. Ioannides and Harris [5] introduced the fatigue-limiting shear stress to the original L-P fatigue model and put it forward in an integral form, which could be applied with the finite element method [6][7][8]. After that, Zaretsky [9] suggested that the Weibull distribution slope and the shear stress-life exponent should be taken into account independently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a common statistical fatigue life model, the L-P fatigue model is constantly modified. Ioannides and Harris [5] introduced the fatigue-limiting shear stress to the original L-P fatigue model and put it forward in an integral form, which could be applied with the finite element method [6][7][8]. After that, Zaretsky [9] suggested that the Weibull distribution slope and the shear stress-life exponent should be taken into account independently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%