2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.242248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calpastatin Domain L Is a Partial Agonist of the Calmodulin-binding Site for Channel Activation in Cav1.2 Ca2+ Channels

Abstract: Cav1.2 Ca2؉ channel activity diminishes in inside-out patches (run-down). Previously, we have found that with ATP, calpastatin domain L (CSL) and calmodulin (CaM) recover channel activity from the run-down in guinea pig cardiac myocytes. Because the potency of the CSL repriming effect was smaller than that of CaM, we hypothesized that CSL might act as a partial agonist of CaM in the channel-repriming effect. To examine this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of the competitions between CSL and CaM on chann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the maximum effect of CS L was only 14% of the CaM effect; the effects of CS L and CaM were not simply additive; and CS L even suppressed the effect of CaM in a concentration-dependent manner [8]. Thus, it is proposed that CS L may compete with CaM for binding with Cav1.2 as a partial agonist [8], and this kind of competitive binding of CaM and CS L was eventually confirmed on the IQ motif [8]. , in IQ motif, significantly affect the CaM binding to the preIQ and IQ peptides, respectively [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the maximum effect of CS L was only 14% of the CaM effect; the effects of CS L and CaM were not simply additive; and CS L even suppressed the effect of CaM in a concentration-dependent manner [8]. Thus, it is proposed that CS L may compete with CaM for binding with Cav1.2 as a partial agonist [8], and this kind of competitive binding of CaM and CS L was eventually confirmed on the IQ motif [8]. , in IQ motif, significantly affect the CaM binding to the preIQ and IQ peptides, respectively [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purification of the GST-fusion proteins was as described in the previous reports [8,12,13] As for CS L fusion protein, the GST portion of it was removed by using the PreScission Protease (GE Healthcare). All steps were performed on ice or at 4°C.…”
Section: Preparation Of Gst-fusion Peptides Of Cav12 and Cs Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4(1440 -1982)) and the Y1595E mutant containing a GST tag were cloned, expressed, and purified as noted before (22). GST pull-down assays were used to monitor binding of CaBP4 to Cav1.4(1440 -1982)-GST as described previously (23). Protein samples of CaBP4 and Cav1.4(1440 -1982)-GST were dissolved in Buffer A (0.1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl 2 , 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and protease inhibitors), concentrated to 0.5 ml (10 M each), mixed with 0.5 ml of GST-Sepharose beads for 10 min, and then centrifuged for 5 min at 500 ϫ g. Bead pellets were washed twice with Buffer A for 5 min at 4°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%