2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5sm01558h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calorimetric evidence for a mobile surface layer in ultrathin polymeric films: poly(2-vinyl pyridine)

Abstract: Specific heat spectroscopy was used to study the dynamic glass transition of ultrathin poly(2-vinyl pyridine) films (thicknesses: 405-10 nm). The amplitude and the phase angle of the differential voltage were obtained as a measure of the complex heat capacity. In a traditional data analysis, the dynamic glass transition temperature T g is estimated from the phase angle. These data showed no thickness dependency on T g down to 22 nm (error of the measurement of AE3 K). A derivative-based method was established,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is different from that reported for the dynamic glass transition measured for identically prepared PVME/PS films, probed by SHS in the frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 4 Hz . For the method and data analysis, see refs and . The results are summarized in the relaxation map (Figure ), where the relaxation rate f p is plotted versus inverse temperature.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This behavior is different from that reported for the dynamic glass transition measured for identically prepared PVME/PS films, probed by SHS in the frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 4 Hz . For the method and data analysis, see refs and . The results are summarized in the relaxation map (Figure ), where the relaxation rate f p is plotted versus inverse temperature.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“… 106 Table 1 shows the γ Total , γ LW , and γ P values for P2VP, Al, alumina, and SiO 2 calculated from the contact angle values available in the literature. 58 , 107 , 108 One can estimate the interfacial energy between two materials, in our case, the polymer ″P″ and the substrate ″S″, as follows: 109 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in T g therm was traced back to the influence of an adsorbed layer, with a reduced mobility and higher T g therm . The effect of this layer becomes more pronounced with decreasing film thickness. , However, for thin films of homopolymers, investigations of the molecular mobility, e.g., by dielectric , and specific heat spectroscopy, , probing the α-relaxation (segmental dynamics and dynamic glass transition temperature T g dyn ) responsible for the glass transition, showed no thickness dependence of T g dyn . Please note that T g dyn is measured at temperatures above T g therm .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%