2005
DOI: 10.1002/poc.977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calorimetric determination of hydrogen‐bonding enthalpy for neat aliphatic alcohols

Abstract: Hydrogen bonding in pure aliphatic alcohols is investigated using a novel calorimetric approach. Average enthalpies of hydrogen bonding were determined for methanol, ethanol, propan‐1‐ol, propan‐2‐ol, butan‐1‐ol, hexan‐1‐ol and octan‐1‐ol. For all the studied alcohols except methanol the average hydrogen‐bonding enthalpies fall in the range from −16.9 to −17.7 kJ mol−1. A slightly smaller value of −15.1 kJ mol−1 was observed for methanol. From the enthalpies of the specific interactions of the alcohols and chl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these eight 1-alkanols the geometric mean of both ε AB (association energy) and the κ AB (association volume) were calculated and were subsequently assumed to be constant for all alkanols. The value of ε AB = 2811.02 K is in fair agreement with the theoretical value obtained by Nath and Bender [13], the values experimentally estimated by Solomonov et al [14]; and also Huang and Radosz [4] and Gross and Sadowski [6] estimated association Table 1 Modifications of the simplified PC-SAFT EoS [2] compared to the PC-SAFT EoS [1] PC-SAFT [1] Simplified PC-SAFT [2] g hs ij = 1…”
Section: Generalized Pure Compound Parameters For Alkanolssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these eight 1-alkanols the geometric mean of both ε AB (association energy) and the κ AB (association volume) were calculated and were subsequently assumed to be constant for all alkanols. The value of ε AB = 2811.02 K is in fair agreement with the theoretical value obtained by Nath and Bender [13], the values experimentally estimated by Solomonov et al [14]; and also Huang and Radosz [4] and Gross and Sadowski [6] estimated association Table 1 Modifications of the simplified PC-SAFT EoS [2] compared to the PC-SAFT EoS [1] PC-SAFT [1] Simplified PC-SAFT [2] g hs ij = 1…”
Section: Generalized Pure Compound Parameters For Alkanolssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This has been confirmed by, e.g. Solomonov et al [14] where a lower hydrogen bonding enthalpy compared to C 2 -C 8 1-alkanols was determined experimentally. The determined parameters are referred as 'generalized alkanol parameters' in the following text and presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Generalized Pure Compound Parameters For Alkanolssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Studies of hydrogen bond formation in aliphatic alcohols have been carried out with different experimental methods, for example, vapor pressure [3,4] and calorimetric measurements [5][6][7][8], infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy [9][10][11][12][13][14] and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [15][16][17][18][19] techniques. The authors attempted to solve two major tasks in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the solvents' polarizability capacity which contributes to the solvation process of 2-AdO (with a polarizable = O bond) but not to that of 1-AdBr or 1-AdOH. This fact also excludes the use of benzene as a possible reference solvent, for which the corresponding empirical coefficients are known [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%