“…For the TBAF (3.4 mol%) semiclathrate, 79.5% of the small cages are partially filled with water molecules [34], which indicates that the TBAF semiclathrate possesses fewer numbers of vacant small cages that are available for capturing CO 2 and N 2 gas molecules compared with the TBAB and TBAC semiclathrates. Furthermore, the TBAB (3.7 mol%) semiclathrate has a higher extent of filling of the small cages with TBA cations than that of the TBAC (3.3 mol%) semiclathrate [37,47,56], which results in a lower gas storage capacity for the TBAB (3.7 mol%) semiclathrate compared to the TBAC (3.3 mol%) semiclathrate. For these reasons, the TBAC (3.3 mol%) semiclathrate has a larger number of small cages that can be effectively used for capturing CO 2 and N 2 molecules, and therefore, demonstrates a larger gas uptake and steeper changes in the CO 2 concentration than the TBAB and TBAF semiclathrates as shown in Figs.…”