2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2114833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
271
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
14
271
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This risk is probably not relevant if macronutrient and micronutrient requirements were obtained. The main side effects reported in fasting studies are fatigue, headache, and dizziness [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This risk is probably not relevant if macronutrient and micronutrient requirements were obtained. The main side effects reported in fasting studies are fatigue, headache, and dizziness [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent randomized trial, Liu and al. reported that TRF (between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.) with a daily 25% caloric restriction was not more beneficial with regard to reduction in body weight or metabolic risk factors than the same daily caloric restriction alone [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major challenge in translating IF regimens into clinical practice is the contradictory results found in human studies investigating the effects of IF diets on human metabolism 22–26,197 . One reason for these discrepancies stems from the human individual response to IF diets.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical studies show that IF diets increase life expectancy and provide a wide range of benefits, including mitigation of obesity, hypertension, T2D, and CVDs 17–19 . However, other studies have found that time‐specific diets are not superior to energy restriction in improving cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes 20–24 . More recent meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials in overweight or obese patients indicated that intermittent energy restriction involving 2–3 days of periodic fasting led to improved weight loss and reduced body fat versus continuous energy restriction 25,26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), is well known to improve the health spans and life spans of laboratory animals ( 2 ). In obese patients, caloric restriction–induced weight loss is not further improved by time-restricted feeding (eating only between 8:00 am and 4:00 pm), suggesting that global caloric intake is the most important determinant of the metabolic consequence of fasting ( 3 ). However, when applied to mice, continuous caloric restriction appears to be more efficient in reducing the development and progression of cancer than intermittent fasting ( 4 ).…”
Section: Fastingmentioning
confidence: 99%