2019
DOI: 10.1177/2167702619856342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Callousness and Affective Face Processing: Clarifying the Neural Basis of Behavioral-Recognition Deficits Through the Use of Brain Event-Related Potentials

Abstract: Callousness encompasses a lack of guilt, shallow affect, and deficient affiliative tendencies and relates to severe antisocial behavior. Across developmental stages, callousness is associated with abnormalities in emotional processing, including decreased physiological reactivity to emotional faces. The current study recruited an adult participant sample to investigate selective associations of callousness with deficits in behavioral performance and reduced neurophysiological response within a face-processing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(94 reference statements)
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of importance to the current work, evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological modalities supports the notion that CA, as a manifestation of AFF−, involves a deficit in social processing, specifically in the ability to recognize and respond to others' distress (Shirtcliff et al, 2009;Marsh et al, 2008;Marsh, 2016;Viding et al, 2012;Brislin & Patrick, 2019). For example, children, adolescents, and adults high in trait CA show reduced accuracy in categorizing emotional faces as fearful or sad (Marsh & Blair, 2008;White et al, 2015) and amygdala hypoactivity to fearful faces, in particular (Marsh & Blair 2008;Marsh, 2016;Viding et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of importance to the current work, evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological modalities supports the notion that CA, as a manifestation of AFF−, involves a deficit in social processing, specifically in the ability to recognize and respond to others' distress (Shirtcliff et al, 2009;Marsh et al, 2008;Marsh, 2016;Viding et al, 2012;Brislin & Patrick, 2019). For example, children, adolescents, and adults high in trait CA show reduced accuracy in categorizing emotional faces as fearful or sad (Marsh & Blair, 2008;White et al, 2015) and amygdala hypoactivity to fearful faces, in particular (Marsh & Blair 2008;Marsh, 2016;Viding et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…For example, children, adolescents, and adults high in trait CA show reduced accuracy in categorizing emotional faces as fearful or sad (Marsh & Blair, 2008;White et al, 2015) and amygdala hypoactivity to fearful faces, in particular (Marsh & Blair 2008;Marsh, 2016;Viding et al, 2012). More recently, in adult samples, self-reported CA has been linked to reductions in brain-eventrelated potential (ERP) reactivity to fearful faces (Brislin & Patrick, 2019;Brislin et al, 2018). Specifically, individuals high in CA show blunted amplitude of ERP components thought to reflect face detection/categorization and emotional encoding processesnamely, N170 and P2, respectively (Shannon, Patrick, Venables, & He, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Future efforts to interface traits of the AMPD with neurobiology would also benefit from consideration of neural measures that relate selectively to callous-aggressiveness ("meanness"; Patrick et al, 2009), the biobehavioral counterpart to the Antagonism domain of the AMPD trait model. Neural measures of callous-aggressiveness include reduced amygdala activation and reduced early brain-ERP (N170, P200) response to affective face stimuli (fearful faces in particular; Brislin et al, 2018;Brislin & Patrick, 2019;Jones, Laurens, Herba, Barker, & Viding, 2009;Marsh et al, 2008). Work of this kind would help to advance understanding of biobehavioral pathways to distinct forms of externalizing psychopathology marked by deficient inhibitory control versus predatory exploitativeness.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%