2006
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Callosal involvement in a lateralized stroop task in alcoholic and healthy subjects.

Abstract: To investigate the role of interhemispheric attentional processes, 25 alcoholic and 28 control subjects were tested with a Stroop match-to-sample task and callosal areas were measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Stroop color-word stimuli were presented to the left or right visual field (VF) and were preceded by a color cue that did or did not match the word's color. For matching colors, both groups showed a right VF advantage; for nonmatching colors, controls showed a left VF advantage, whereas alcoholic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such neuropsychological deficits have classically been associated with impaired function of the frontal lobes, but more recently, also with alterations within the corticocerebellar circuit (Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997;Sullivan, 2003). Previous investigations on alcoholism have provided evidence of an association between white matter structure in the corpus callosum and certain components of executive functions, eg attention skills and inhibitory control (Schulte et al, 2006). In our own recent study, decreased white matter volume in the midbrain of alcoholdependent subjects was related to impaired performance in two executive tasks: the Trail-Making Test part-B (TMT-B) and the WAIS letter-number sequencing test (LNS; Chanraud et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such neuropsychological deficits have classically been associated with impaired function of the frontal lobes, but more recently, also with alterations within the corticocerebellar circuit (Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997;Sullivan, 2003). Previous investigations on alcoholism have provided evidence of an association between white matter structure in the corpus callosum and certain components of executive functions, eg attention skills and inhibitory control (Schulte et al, 2006). In our own recent study, decreased white matter volume in the midbrain of alcoholdependent subjects was related to impaired performance in two executive tasks: the Trail-Making Test part-B (TMT-B) and the WAIS letter-number sequencing test (LNS; Chanraud et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different behavioral Chanraud et al (2013). paradigms have been devised to elicit response disinhibition, such as the GO/NOGO task (Colrain et al, 2011;Kamarajan et al, 2005), Stop-Signal task (Li, Luo, Yan, Bergquist, & Sinha, 2009), Balloon-Analogue Risk Task (Fein & Chang, 2008), and the Stroop color-word task (Schulte, Müller-Oehring, Pfefferbaum, & Sullivan, 2006), all based on the concept of inhibiting a natural or learned compelling response and amendable to testing with fMRI. A common finding in task-activated paradigms tapping response inhibition has been weaker connectivity in frontostriatal networks in alcoholics compared with controls (Courtney, Ghahremani, & Ray, 2013).…”
Section: Frontostriatal Circuitrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stroop Match-to-Sample Task (Schulte et al, 2006) is such a task and was designed to engage cognitive processes involving attentional control and conflict resolution when automatic processing of task-irrelevant word content interferes. One set of findings from this paradigm found that healthy young adults (aged 19-30 years) activated an anterior network for Stroop-match, and a posterior network was activated for Stroop-nonmatch.…”
Section: Frontostriatal Circuitrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presented the two stimuli sequentially in order to address attentional allocation with the color patch acting as a cue (Posner and Peterson 1990). The paradoxical finding that greater Stroop effects occur when the cue color correctly predicts the color of the Stroop word (match) than when the color cue misdirects attention in non-match trials (Schulte et al 2005) is a stable phenomenon that we observed in different neuropsychiatric conditions and with different subjects (Schulte et al 2006(Schulte et al , 2007. It is further consistent with another study by Chen (2003), who found that the Stroop interference was greater when the cue was valid than when it was invalid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Using the Match-to-Sample Stroop task, we observed that individuals with HIV performed at a comparable level to controls in conflict processing and attentional allocation, whereas alcoholics showed prolonged reaction times (RT) on this task, and those with HIV+alcoholism were even slower. A greater Stroop effect in alcoholics was related to a smaller size of the corpus callosum suggesting involvement of callosal interhemispheric pathways in word-color Stroop processes that becomes apparent when callosal integrity is compromised (Schulte et al 2006). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) derived measures of microstructure in alcoholism (Pfefferbaum et al , 2006a and HIV (Pfefferbaum et al 2006b may reveal even more robust effects than MRI-derived measures of callosal size in identifying disruptions in regional callosal systems that contribute to lateralized components of attentional allocation and conflict processing (Pfefferbaum et al 1997;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%