Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over)dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction

Hall, Jeffrey A.; Baym, Nancy K.

doi:10.1177/1461444811415047

Cited by 180 publications

(162 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

143

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It exposes an intense relational need fraught with insecurities. A passionate reliance on community can draw people close, but it may hinder efforts to obtain valuable insight, direction, and encouragement (Hall and Baym 2011).…”

Section: Implications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…these relationships to be bidirectional and mutually transparent (Sbanotto 2012). When equality and candor are obviously active, the friendship can become a safe and trustworthy engagement prompting commitment between the participants (Hall and Baym 2011). In conversations with Millennial members or attenders, church leadership (i.e., elders, deacons, and volunteer mentors) need to empathize and validate.…”

Section: Applications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The vulnerability and authenticity can be both attractive and didactic (Sbanotto and Blomberg 2016). Protestant Millennials can vicariously learn from the mistakes/successes of more experienced followers of Christ, which strengthens the importance of leaning into others in a healthy manner (Hall and Baym 2011). The personal stories of leaders can help normalize existential questioning, avoid the appearance of being doubtless, and potentially open opportunities for Millennials to self-disclose more of their doubts (Kinnaman 2011;Sbanotto and Blomberg 2016).…”

Section: Applications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Have others labeled their new theological views falsehoods and are they wondering what to do with those opinions (Vicari 2014)? Such inquiries can model genuine concern for a Protestant Millennial, a willingness to assist them in a struggle, and demonstrate boldness in the pursuit of matters of the heart (Hall and Baym 2011). The answers to the aforementioned questions can create a sense of vulnerability since the young parishioners may be releasing personal secrets.…”

Section: Applications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Protestant Millennials, Religious Doubt, & the Local Church

Puffer

2017

Religions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Millennials are the most analyzed and populous generation in the United States. Collectively, they have been slowly re-shaping the American culture. Protestant Millennials, a subset of this generation, have been ruffling feathers in their local churches. Many, who once regularly attended, are leaving. Unwise responses by local church leaders to their young parishioners' doubting habits significantly contributed to the departure. This study pursued a sample of college-aged Protestant Millennials to know them in a psychological sense. The intentions were twofold: to discover social personality traits that predict their doubting practices and to develop practical and proactive relational strategies for local church leaders. Self-report data on personality features and doubt phenomena were obtained from 532 religiously committed undergraduates in the United States. Results from multivariate regression procedures revealed three social personality dispositions contributed to the prediction of the doubt constructs. Implications and applications of the findings are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Implications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Applications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Applications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Applications For Intolerance and Dependencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Protestant Millennials, Religious Doubt, & the Local Church

Puffer

2017

Religions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They are also interwoven with other online activities (news gathering, shopping, gaming, and so forth), which together contribute to the social construction of media as indispensable things (Jansson, 2014b). There are several empirical studies showing that a life without mobile media devices and various social media applications would be more or less unthinkable to many social groups today and that people even develop counter-routines in order to cope with their experiences of being increasingly "addicted" to keeping an eye on various information flows and updates, responses to things they have posted online and the fluctuations of social media scores (e.g., Bengtsson, 2015;Hall & Baym, 2012;Paasonen, 2014).…”

Section: Interveillance and The Dialectics Of Mediatizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interveillance: A New Culture of Recognition and Mediatization

Jansson

2015

MaC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The everyday uses of networked media technologies, especially social media, have revolutionized the classical model of top-down surveillance. This article sketches the contours of an emerging culture of interveillance where nonhierarchical and non-systematic monitoring practices are part of everyday life. It also introduces a critical perspective on how the industrial logics of dominant social media, through which interveillance practices are normalized, resonate with social forces already at play in individualized societies. The argument is developed in three steps. Firstly, it is argued that the concept of interveillance is needed, and must be distinguished from surveillance, in order to critically assess the everyday mutual sharing and disclosure of private information (of many different kinds). Secondly, it is argued that the culture of interveillance responds to the social deficit of recognition that characterizes highly individualized societies. Finally, it is argued that the culture of interveillance constitutes a defining instance and even represents a new stage of the meta-process of mediatization. The dialectical nature of interveillance integrates and reinforces the overarching ambiguities of mediatization, whereby the opportunities for individuals and groups to achieve growing freedom and autonomy are paralleled by limitations and dependences vis-à-vis media.

show abstract