2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Call playback artificially generates a temporary cultural style of high affiliation in marmosets

Abstract: Cultural variation can be conceptualised in two main ways: as culture-specific qualitative differences in behavioural form, and also as quantitative variation in performance of constellations of universal behaviours (cultural style). Despite observation of both types in wild non-human primates, diffusion of qualitative culture has been scrutinised extensively experimentally whilst within-species transmission of cultural style has remained entirely unexplored. Here we investigated whether a cultural style of hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, further experimental research (cf. Watson et al, 2014 ) is needed to identify the mechanisms involved in the suggested social transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, further experimental research (cf. Watson et al, 2014 ) is needed to identify the mechanisms involved in the suggested social transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, common marmosets have been shown to exhibit conformity with regard to socially learned foraging techniques (Gunhold et al, 2014 ) and with regard to certain personality traits (Koski and Burkart, 2015 ; Šlipogor et al, 2016 ), and these “group-personalities” have been suggested to enhance cooperation and group cohesion. Social contagion of agonism and affiliation has already been shown between groups of marmosets (Watson and Caldwell, 2010 ), and can even be experimentally induced (Watson et al, 2014 ). These studies suggest a neighbor effect in marmosets, but within-group contagion remains unstudied in this species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Studies exploring how positive interactions of conspecifics may lead to contagion in bystanders have focussed on a range of behaviours associated with positive affect, and their associated acoustic cues. For example, in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus, playbacks of chirp calls given during affiliation led to an increase in rates of positive social behaviours [13], and in zoo-housed groups of chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, the frequency of grooming behaviour was found to be positively related to the number of grooming-related vocalizations from a neighbouring group [14]. In kea parrots, Nestor notabilis, individuals hearing the playback of calls given in the context of social play showed an increase in likelihood of playing with conspecifics [15] and in rats, playbacks of ultrasonic calls given during play led to an increase in prosocial approach behaviour [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that intraspecific variation in primate sociality may in part emerge through social learning has been explored experimentally in marmosets (3,33) and chimpanzees (28). In response to prerecorded affiliative calls of familiar conspecifics, marmosets were found to temporarily increase their overall levels of affiliative behavior (33). In another study, the same species was shown to exhibit group-level differences in individual boldness produced by social effects (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%