2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1130-6343(09)71155-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calidad estructural de las bases de datos de interacciones

Abstract: A third of the DID comply with the minimum criteria. Differences were observed in the level and compliance criteria among Spanish and foreign DID. Some of the main DID used as references in the bibliography have significant structural defects: no web presentation, no multi-check function and others.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, children admitted to EDs have critical medical conditions that make them more susceptible to the administration of multiple drugs, to complex treatment regimens, to long ED stays and to care by different specialist physicians for consultations [ 19 20 ]. There are more than 54 different softwares for DDIs assessment [ 28 ], but according to a systematic review that included articles of children and adults between 1976 and 2014, the most widely used are the Drug-Relax software from Micromedex® Healthcare Series, Drug Interactions Facts®, Lexi-Interact®, Pharmavista®, EpocratesRx®, MediQ® and Drug interaction checker® [ 29 ]. The reason why in this study the Medscape Drug Interaction Checker software was selected is because we consider it to be highly likely to be used in clinical practice owing to its simple and free access in addition to being easy to use and having good structural quality [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, children admitted to EDs have critical medical conditions that make them more susceptible to the administration of multiple drugs, to complex treatment regimens, to long ED stays and to care by different specialist physicians for consultations [ 19 20 ]. There are more than 54 different softwares for DDIs assessment [ 28 ], but according to a systematic review that included articles of children and adults between 1976 and 2014, the most widely used are the Drug-Relax software from Micromedex® Healthcare Series, Drug Interactions Facts®, Lexi-Interact®, Pharmavista®, EpocratesRx®, MediQ® and Drug interaction checker® [ 29 ]. The reason why in this study the Medscape Drug Interaction Checker software was selected is because we consider it to be highly likely to be used in clinical practice owing to its simple and free access in addition to being easy to use and having good structural quality [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although health care professionals can perform DDI extraction using different databases, those being used currently are rarely complete because their update periods can be as long as three years [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although health care professionals are supported by different DDI databases, the update periods of these databases are generally three years. Therefore, these databases are rarely complete [3]. Since drug interactions are frequently reported in clinical pharmacology journals and technical reports, a major source of detecting DDIs is the exponential increase in biomedical literature [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%