2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calicovesicostomy surgery in the patient with ureteral rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies, such as Kunj Jain et al (mean 16.28 months), 10 Yucai Wu et al (mean 24.5 months), 12 Brian W Chao et al (median 21 months), 18 Ghosh et al (mean 25 months) 27 and Xinfei Li et al (median 27.3 + 17.2 months), 19 have relatively long follow‐up periods. However, others, like Alsaadi et al (1 and 5 months), 20 Farzad et al (8 months) 21 and AbdelBakayko et al (3 months), 22 have short follow‐up durations. Most of these studies consist of small case series, such as Ben Sionov et al, 11 Yucai Wu et al, 12 Alsaadi et al, 20 Farzad et al 21 and AbdelBakayko et al 22 The length of the ureteric segment has not been mentioned in many reports, including those by Ben Sionov et al, 11 Wenske et al, 26 Gozen et al 24 and AbdelBakayko et al 22 All of these limitations make it exceedingly challenging to make an objective assessment of the success of the Boari flap procedure based on the available literature. It is also imperative to note that accurately establishing the precise complication rates attributable to the specific utilization of the Boari flap is challenging because most studies reported complication rates collectively for all techniques employed for ureteral reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies, such as Kunj Jain et al (mean 16.28 months), 10 Yucai Wu et al (mean 24.5 months), 12 Brian W Chao et al (median 21 months), 18 Ghosh et al (mean 25 months) 27 and Xinfei Li et al (median 27.3 + 17.2 months), 19 have relatively long follow‐up periods. However, others, like Alsaadi et al (1 and 5 months), 20 Farzad et al (8 months) 21 and AbdelBakayko et al (3 months), 22 have short follow‐up durations. Most of these studies consist of small case series, such as Ben Sionov et al, 11 Yucai Wu et al, 12 Alsaadi et al, 20 Farzad et al 21 and AbdelBakayko et al 22 The length of the ureteric segment has not been mentioned in many reports, including those by Ben Sionov et al, 11 Wenske et al, 26 Gozen et al 24 and AbdelBakayko et al 22 All of these limitations make it exceedingly challenging to make an objective assessment of the success of the Boari flap procedure based on the available literature. It is also imperative to note that accurately establishing the precise complication rates attributable to the specific utilization of the Boari flap is challenging because most studies reported complication rates collectively for all techniques employed for ureteral reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies, such as Kunj Jain et al (mean 16.28 months), 10 Yucai Wu et al (mean 24.5 months), 12 Brian W Chao et al (median 21 months), 18 Ghosh et al (mean 25 months) 27 and Xinfei Li et al (median 27.3 + 17.2 months), 19 have relatively long follow‐up periods. However, others, like Alsaadi et al (1 and 5 months), 20 Farzad et al (8 months) 21 and AbdelBakayko et al (3 months), 22 have short follow‐up durations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations