1999
DOI: 10.1086/306805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrator Design for theCOBEFar‐Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS)

Abstract: The photometric errors of the external calibrator for the FIRAS instrument on the COBE are smaller than the measurement errors on the cosmic microwave background (CMBR) spectrum (typically 0.02 MJy/sr, 1 σ), and smaller than 0.01% of the peak brightness of the CMBR. The calibrator is a re-entrant cone, shaped like a trumpet mute, made of Eccosorb iron-loaded epoxy. It fills the entire beam of the instrument and is the source of its accuracy. Its known errors are caused by reflections, temperature gradients, an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
569
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 487 publications
(591 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
14
569
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Following a detailed analysis of the FIRAS data (Fixsen et al 1996) we removed a model consisting of a spatially uniform blackbody spectrum with a temperature of T ¼ 2:7275 K (the final recalibration has not been applied to Pass 4 data) and a dipole component with T ¼ 3:368 mK from the sky maps. Any errors in the data caused by thermometry errors (Mather et al 1999) are on the 30 lK level and are negligible for studying the ZD cloud.…”
Section: Cmb Cib Ism and Zd Emission Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a detailed analysis of the FIRAS data (Fixsen et al 1996) we removed a model consisting of a spatially uniform blackbody spectrum with a temperature of T ¼ 2:7275 K (the final recalibration has not been applied to Pass 4 data) and a dipole component with T ¼ 3:368 mK from the sky maps. Any errors in the data caused by thermometry errors (Mather et al 1999) are on the 30 lK level and are negligible for studying the ZD cloud.…”
Section: Cmb Cib Ism and Zd Emission Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is that the horizon scale of the scalar field model at the time of recombination is greater compared with that of the ΛCDM model because the effective gravitational constant G eff is smaller in the past. The opposite is true in the case of the scalar field model of Nagata et al (2004), for which the value of G eff is larger in the past.…”
Section: Cosmological Model With Morikawa's Scalarmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Here, we employ ξ = −1 and −3, the absolute values of which are an order of magnitude smaller than that inferred from the previous analysis of the N -z relation of galaxies(ξ = −40). The values of the other parameters are as follows: Ω m,0 = 0.237, Ω b,0 h 2 100 = 0.024, Ω φ,0 = 0.15(hence Ω Λ,0 = 0.613), m φ = 3.7 × 10 −31 h 100 eV, h 100 = 0.72 (Freedman et al 2001), n s = 1 is the spectral index (Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum) for the initial condition for the matter density perturbation, T CMB,0 = 2.726 K (Mather et al 1999) for the present CMB temperature, and the optical depth of our universe is τ = 0.089 for the CMB, (Spergel et al 2007), which, together with ξ = −40, characterize the best-fit model proposed in the present study. Furthermore, we adopt Y He = 0.24 for the cosmic abundance(by mass) of He and 3.04 for the number of neutrino species (Nagata et al 2004).…”
Section: Cosmological Model With Morikawa's Scalarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3.2.3), we base all string simulations on the single testing string simulation (Fig. 6(b)), smoothing with a 7.3 arcmin Gaussian beam and rescaling by the appropriate T 0 Gµ (assuming the mean CMB temperature of T 0 = 2.725 K; Mather et al 1999). We do not touch the training string simulation (Fig.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%