2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of an ecosystem model applied to artificial streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…van Nes et al (2002) showed ≤20% sensitivity for all selected parameters within PISCATOR, a multi-species individual-based fish model. PCB concentration in bass was most sensitive to optimal temperature, which is consistent with Sourisseau et al (2008), who showed that predators' highest sensitivity in an AQUA-TOX application for two artificial streams was also optimum temperature. Model users should be aware of the potentially high sensitivity of higher trophic groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…van Nes et al (2002) showed ≤20% sensitivity for all selected parameters within PISCATOR, a multi-species individual-based fish model. PCB concentration in bass was most sensitive to optimal temperature, which is consistent with Sourisseau et al (2008), who showed that predators' highest sensitivity in an AQUA-TOX application for two artificial streams was also optimum temperature. Model users should be aware of the potentially high sensitivity of higher trophic groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Based on the high sensitivity of fish PCB concentration to maximum consumption, respiration, half-saturation parameters, it appears to be a property of the model that the feeding parameters are "balanced" to predict a stable biomass for fish and invertebrates. Both this study and Sourisseau et al (2008) found that the highest sensitivities for algae in AQUATOX were saturating light, optimum temperature, and maximum photosynthetic rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The value of NS can be negative or positive, with a maximum absolute value of 1. A positive value indicates that the simulated values describe the trend of the measured data better than the mean of the observation values, while a negative value indicates that the corresponding model output is dissimilar to the behavior of the studied system (Sourisseau et al 2007;Arabi et al 2007). Obviously, a higher NS value (close to 1) means a better fit of the predicted hydrograph to the observed one.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the complex food web (i.e. ecosystem) models of river ecosystems include multiple species of flora and fauna [29,30], but these remain difficult to parameterise [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%