2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00769-002-0440-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration uncertainty

Abstract: Methods recommended by the International Standardization Organisation and Eurachem are not satisfactory for the correct estimation of calibration uncertainty. A novel approach is introduced and tested on actual calibration data for the determination of Pb by ICP-AES. The improved calibration uncertainty was verified from independent measurements of the same sample by demonstrating statistical control of analytical results and the absence of bias. The proposed method takes into account uncertainties of the meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24,25 The BTEX concentrations determined with the Chrompack CP 7001 monitor were plotted versus those determined with each type of passive sampler. The results are presented in Figures 3 and 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 The BTEX concentrations determined with the Chrompack CP 7001 monitor were plotted versus those determined with each type of passive sampler. The results are presented in Figures 3 and 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a supervised experiment [4], analytical results obtained by 10 independent operators, each using their own calibration data, were found to be in complete statistical control -but only because the predicted uncertainty was based on a properly verified uncertainty budget. There was no need -as suggested by Andersen -to correct the predicted uncertainty by an arbitrary factor of √2!…”
Section: Comments On the Concept Of Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, very few standard solutions are available on the market up to now, and not one of those is certified, making the selection of the calibrant solution a very critical step in the determination of SCCPs. It has been already demonstrated that grossly biased results can result from improper calibration, 30 undermining the accuracy of the measurement. 31 Often, the uncertainty of the calibration step is the largest contribution to the combined uncertainty of the analytical result.…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%