2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration requirements for epoch of reionization 21-cm signal observations – I. Effect of time-correlated gains

Abstract: The residual gain errors add to the systematics of the radio interferometric observations. In case of the high dynamic range observations, these systematic effects dominates over the thermal noise of the observation. In this work, we investigate the effect of time-correlated residual gain errors in the estimation of the power spectrum of the sky brightness distribution in high dynamic range observations. Particularly, we discuss a methodology to estimate the bias in the power spectrum estimator of the redshift… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, there are several different ways which may contaminate the foreground free cosmological window above the 'wedge', like residual calibration errors, po-larization leakage, ionospheric effects, the variation of beam, etc and affect the estimation of the Hi 21 cm power spectrum (Gehlot et al 2018;Joseph et al 2020;Kumar et al 2020). Although the estimated power spectrum for different redshift bins are close to the thermal noise, the resultant power spectrum may still be affected by any plausible residual systematics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, there are several different ways which may contaminate the foreground free cosmological window above the 'wedge', like residual calibration errors, po-larization leakage, ionospheric effects, the variation of beam, etc and affect the estimation of the Hi 21 cm power spectrum (Gehlot et al 2018;Joseph et al 2020;Kumar et al 2020). Although the estimated power spectrum for different redshift bins are close to the thermal noise, the resultant power spectrum may still be affected by any plausible residual systematics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to note that this does not suppress the foreground below the 21-cm power spectrum. Kumar et al (2020) demonstrated that the residual grain errors in 21-cm observations in presence of strong foreground is a major challenge for reionization and post reionization power spectrum measurements. The residual gain errors through the strong foreground signal introduce a bias in the 21-cm power spectrum estimates and enhance its variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To observe the redshifted 21-cm signal one need to model and subtract the diffused synchrotron foreground signal. Given that the amplitude of the foreground is much higher than the redshifted 21-cm signal, such observations require high dynamic range calibration of the observed visibilities (Datta et al, 2010;Kumar et al, 2020). The lensed 21-cm angular power spectrum estimator reduces the effective amplitude of this foreground and hence improve the calibration requirements.…”
Section: Effect Of Foregroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A striking advantage of this approach is that the strong lensing by a lens at a redshift of z l enhances the signal from the redshifted 21-cm emission at a redshift of zs > z l , however, it does not enhance the diffused emission from the Galaxy, which acts as a foreground to the 21-cm signal. The major challenge with the foreground signals like DGSE is that they are inherently several orders of magnitude larger (Di Matteo et al, 2002;Oh & Mack, 2003;Jelić et al, 2008;Ali et al, 2008;Ghosh et al, 2011;Paciga et al, 2013) than the redshifted 21-cm signal and hence effects like residual foregrounds after the subtraction, residual gain errors add to bias in the estimators of the 21-cm power spectra (Datta et al, 2010;Kumar et al, 2020). We observe that for the best cases discussed in this work, that is for the two double halo lens models at a redshift of 0.3, the enhanced visibility correlation signal is still at only a few percent of the expected galactic foreground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%