2012
DOI: 10.5194/essdd-5-853-2012
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration procedures and first data set of Southern Ocean chlorophyll <i>a</i> profiles collected by elephant seal equipped with a newly developed CTD-fluorescence tags

Abstract: Abstract. In-situ observation of the marine environment has traditionally relied on ship-based platforms. The obvious consequence is that physical and biogeochemical properties have been dramatically undersampled, especially in the remote Southern Ocean (SO). The difficulty in obtaining in situ data represents the major limitations to our understanding, and interpretation of the coupling between physical forcing and the biogeochemical response. Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) equipped with a new gen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were collected by 23 elephant seals ( Mirounga Leonina ) of the Kerguelen Island. The tags were deployed during five different periods between 2007 and 2011, transmitting 4498 profiles among which 3388 were usable [see Guinet et al ., , Table 1]. In our study we used a subset of this data set (1819 profiles from 21 tags; Table S1 in the supporting information) collected in high‐chlorophyll regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data were collected by 23 elephant seals ( Mirounga Leonina ) of the Kerguelen Island. The tags were deployed during five different periods between 2007 and 2011, transmitting 4498 profiles among which 3388 were usable [see Guinet et al ., , Table 1]. In our study we used a subset of this data set (1819 profiles from 21 tags; Table S1 in the supporting information) collected in high‐chlorophyll regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done before deployment by comparison of the fluorescence signal with discrete chlorophyll measurements by high‐performance liquid chromatography of samples taken at the same depth [ Xing et al ., ]. For the first two deployments, such predeployment calibration was not achieved and a posttreatment utilizing the relative variations of surface chlorophyll concentrations derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) was applied [ Guinet et al ., ]. For each regions defined below, the mean chlorophyll profile was calculated for periods of 15 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ocean color satellite data are the optimal data set for studying trends and changes in phytoplankton phenology (Henson et al, 2018;Johnson et al, 2013), monitoring changes in polynyas could be improved by additional in situ data such as gliders (Kaufman et al, 2014) and seal-derived hydrographic data (conductivity-temperature-depth satellite relay data loggers with fluorometers; Guinet et al, 2012;Roquet et al, 2013) In particular, seal tags allow a much larger spatial and temporal coverage (Roquet et al, 2013) to the underrepresented seasons (i.e., fall and winter) and areas such as continental shelf and sea ice zones (Roquet…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Oceansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have contributed significantly to our current understanding on the spatio‐temporal dynamics of phytoplankton (Cullen ; Boss and Behrenfeld ). To date, they have been integrated to every oceanographic research platform such as CTD rosettes (Cullen ), flow‐through systems (Platt ), moored buoys (Kinkade et al ; Pettigrew and Roesler ), Bio‐Argo floats (Boss et al ; Mignot et al ; Xing et al ), gliders (Niewiadomska et al ; Sackmann et al ; Cetinić et al ), and even elephant seals (Blain et al ; Guinet et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the non‐zero deep values were considered to be due to a bias resulting from factory calibration as this was established for the sensor alone and not for the sensor mounted on the platform used for its deployment. This bias was thus simply corrected through subtracting a fixed value from the whole fluorescence profile (Schmechtig et al ), generally the deepest value from the profile (e.g., Xing et al ; Guinet et al ). However, such dark current correction often meets a problem in some regions (e.g., some sub‐tropical areas, the Arabian Sea), where the fluorescence signals display unexpected variations with depth in waters deeper than 300 m (Broenkow et al ; Lewitus and Broenkow ; Breves et al ; Claustre et al ), i.e., the so‐called “deep sea red fluorescence.” Figure illustrates this issue in the South East Pacific (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%