2014
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/25/22/225701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of the torsional and lateral spring constants of cantilever sensors

Abstract: A method suitable for the calibration of the spring constants of all torsional and lateral eigenmodes of micro-and nanocantilever sensors is described. Such sensors enable nanomechanical measurements and the characterization of nanomaterials, for example with atomic force microscopy.The method presented involves the interaction of a flow of fluid from a microchannel with the cantilever beam. Forces imparted by the flow cause the cantilever to bend and induce a measurable change of the torsional and lateral res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the spring constant measurement is not a simple task, several widely used static or dynamic experimental calibration methods have been developed such as the static mass hanging method 6 , reference cantilever/spring method 7 8 9 , dynamic mass attachment method 10 , resonant frequency method 11 , and thermal noise method 12 . Very recently, some variants of the above-mentioned calibration methods have been proposed such as the Sader method for surface modified cantilevers 13 , direct thermal noise method for colloidal probe cantilevers 14 , calibration structures-based method 15 and microchannel-aided method 16 . Some closely related topics also attract attention such as the nanoscale-resolved elasticity 17 and the effect of surface stress on the stiffness of micro/nano cantilever 18 , which helps to gain insight into the measurement interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the spring constant measurement is not a simple task, several widely used static or dynamic experimental calibration methods have been developed such as the static mass hanging method 6 , reference cantilever/spring method 7 8 9 , dynamic mass attachment method 10 , resonant frequency method 11 , and thermal noise method 12 . Very recently, some variants of the above-mentioned calibration methods have been proposed such as the Sader method for surface modified cantilevers 13 , direct thermal noise method for colloidal probe cantilevers 14 , calibration structures-based method 15 and microchannel-aided method 16 . Some closely related topics also attract attention such as the nanoscale-resolved elasticity 17 and the effect of surface stress on the stiffness of micro/nano cantilever 18 , which helps to gain insight into the measurement interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the determination of the static flexural spring constant, the presented setup can also be employed to obtain other useful information: knowledge of the static spring constant and the applied force allows the cantilever deflection to be determined, which in turn can be exploited to extract the torsional and lateral spring constants from the same measurement if the corresponding resonant frequencies are recorded [ 30 ]. Furthermore, the setup also allows the linear range of the force constants to be systematically tested for all kinds of cantilever sensors and other micro- and nanomechanical structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were performed with a commercial Bruker Dimension FastScan AFM system (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). In our setup, a custom-built, smooth parallel plate microchannel of height ≈100 μm and length 4.5 mm was used [ 27 , 29 30 ]. An accurate value of the channel height was obtained by contacting the free end of a cantilever on the bottom surface of the channel with the channel aligned parallel to the cantilever length and measuring the distance to the top of the channel by lifting the cantilever with the AFM microstepper motor until it contacted the top surface of the channel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations