Monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Regional Wave Propagation and Crustal Structure 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8262-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of the Regional Crustal Waveguide and the Retrieval of Source Parameters Using Waveform Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short period Rayleigh wave (Rg) is an important index [23] of shallow seismicity, because Rayleigh wave is only well developed when the epicentral distance is large enough. An intraplate earthquake is usually deeper than 5 km, so it is difficult to see Rg wave.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Short period Rayleigh wave (Rg) is an important index [23] of shallow seismicity, because Rayleigh wave is only well developed when the epicentral distance is large enough. An intraplate earthquake is usually deeper than 5 km, so it is difficult to see Rg wave.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He used the differential time between Pg and sPg to measure focal depths of a number of earthquakes. Besides this, there are many related stduies on determining the focal depth using local depth phase [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In brief, the method of determining the focal depth with depth phase has broad application and this method is very useful especially when the station distribution is spare.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other depth phases, however, that are present in regional records that can also be used. In particular, the regional depth phases sPg, sPmP, and sPn, with their reference phases Pg, PmP, and Pn, respectively, are often clearly observable on regional records (e.g., Kings, 1979;Helmberger and Engen, 1980;Zonno and Kind, 1984;Langston, 1987Langston, , 1996Helmberger, 1991, 1993;Bock, 1993;Ebel, 1995;Bock et al, 1996;Zhu and Helmberger, 1997;Saikia, 2000;Saikia et al, 2001;Bent and Perry, 2002;Uski et al, 2003). (Note: Other candidate depth phases, such as pPg, are not generally observed at regional distances.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Distribution of focal depth is essential for understanding stress regime at the depth where earthquake was located, regional seismicity and seismic hazards [3][4][5][6] ; it plays a particularly important role in relating seismicity to geologic structure and delineating active faults [7] . Reliably determined focal depth is also useful for establishing accurate epicentral location and origin time [8] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is a strong trade-off between origin time and depth, especially for shallow-focus earthquake, error in depth determination is serious when local or regional stations nearby the source are unavailable. When the P-wave inversion is not convergent in focal depth, the time separation between depth phase sP (or pP) and its reference phase P is used to constrain focal depth by teleseismic seismograms modeling [3,[6][7][8][9][10] . Depth analysis is usually based on a generic global model, which does not consider the region-specific upper crust, and due to poor azimuthal coverage of seismic stations, thus the error in focal depth is significant even for large events (M w >5) [11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%