2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of the microparameters of the discrete element method using a relevance vector machine and its application to rockfill materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A blind adjustment of the microscopic parameters during the calibration process will increase the difficulty of the test to a large extent. This paper quickly determines the range of parameter values on the basis of mastering the intrinsic connection between the microscopic parameters and macroscopic indices (e.g., the effective modulus E has the highest degree of influence on the elastic modulus, k n and k s have a significant influence on the Poisson's ratio ν, and the coefficient of friction µ mainly affects the peak strength [37]). Finally, minor parameter fine-tuning was carried out according to the indoor test results until the simulation results were in good agreement with the indoor results, and the following microscopic parameters were finally determined, as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Microscopic Parameter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A blind adjustment of the microscopic parameters during the calibration process will increase the difficulty of the test to a large extent. This paper quickly determines the range of parameter values on the basis of mastering the intrinsic connection between the microscopic parameters and macroscopic indices (e.g., the effective modulus E has the highest degree of influence on the elastic modulus, k n and k s have a significant influence on the Poisson's ratio ν, and the coefficient of friction µ mainly affects the peak strength [37]). Finally, minor parameter fine-tuning was carried out according to the indoor test results until the simulation results were in good agreement with the indoor results, and the following microscopic parameters were finally determined, as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Microscopic Parameter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many underground oil and gas storage caverns have been constructed in geological formations composed of compact rock around the world [25][26][27]. In petroleum engineering, the compact rock around the underground oil and gas storage caverns is usually in the saturated status via carrying out artificial water injection to further rise the leakproofness of caverns, aiming for preventing the leakage of oil and gas [28][29][30][31]. For the water-sealed underground oil and gas storage caverns, when experiencing engineering activities such as excavation of caverns, etc., the coupling effect between seepage and stress fields of the saturated surrounding compact is inevitable to occur, which has a significant influence on the stability of underground storage caverns [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Of 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimen size is Φ300 × 600 mm, and the shear rate is 0.4 mm/min with 200 kPa, 500 kPa, 800 kPa, 1200 kPa confining pressures. The deformation characteristic curve calibrates the rockfill's microscopic parameters using the calibration method proposed in [44]. Accordingly, the normal stiffness k n = 3.5MN/m, shear stiffness k s = 2.6MN/m, friction coefficient µ = 0.09, normal bond force b n = 2.2kN, and shear bond force b s = 1.6kN of rockfill particles are determined.…”
Section: Calibration Of Microscopic Parameters Of the Rockfillmentioning
confidence: 99%