2017
DOI: 10.1111/jmg.12264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of the garnet–biotite–Al2SiO5–quartz geobarometer for metapelites

Abstract: A garnet-biotite-Al 2 SiO 5 -quartz (GBAQ) geobarometer was empirically calibrated using more than 700 natural metapelites with a broad compositional range of garnet and biotite under P-T conditions of 450-950°C and 1-17 kbar. In the calibration, activity models of garnet and biotite identical to those in the garnet-biotite (GB) geothermometer of Holdaway [American Mineralogist 2000, 85:881-892] were used. Therefore, the GBAQ geobarometer and the GB geothermometer can be simultaneously applied to iteratively e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These garnet domains are interpreted to have formed at a retrograde stage and indicate pressure decreasing. Conventional geothermobarometry considering mineral equilibria (garnet–biotite geothermometer of Holdaway, ; garnet–biotite–kyanite–quartz geobarometer of Wu, ) instead of a P–T pseudosection was applied to derive the P–T conditions recorded by these retrograde garnet domains. For the outer rim of garnet‐1 and adjacent biotite, P–T conditions of 0.74–0.90 GPa and 610–685°C (Figure ; Table ) resulted.…”
Section: P–t Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These garnet domains are interpreted to have formed at a retrograde stage and indicate pressure decreasing. Conventional geothermobarometry considering mineral equilibria (garnet–biotite geothermometer of Holdaway, ; garnet–biotite–kyanite–quartz geobarometer of Wu, ) instead of a P–T pseudosection was applied to derive the P–T conditions recorded by these retrograde garnet domains. For the outer rim of garnet‐1 and adjacent biotite, P–T conditions of 0.74–0.90 GPa and 610–685°C (Figure ; Table ) resulted.…”
Section: P–t Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrograde P-T conditions calculated for gneiss FJ-1B using the mineral pair Grt-Bt. The calculations were conducted by using the Grt-Bt geothermometer ofHoldaway (2000) and the Grt-Bt-Ky-Q geobarometer ofWu (2017…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrography shows that the equilibrium assemblage of subhedral biotite, plagioclase, quartz and garnet (M2) exists in all four samples; therefore, the Grt–Bt geothermometer (GB: Holdaway, 2000) and the Grt–Bt–Pl–Qz (GBPQ: Wu et al, 2004) geobarometer were coupled to estimate the pressure and temperature at peak metamorphic stage (M2). The Grt–Bt–Al 2 SiO 5 –Qz (GBAQ: Wu, 2017) and Grt–Bt–Ms–Pl (GBMP: Wu, 2015) geobarometers were also used if the sample contains muscovite, kyanite, or sillimanite at this stage. The Ti‐in‐biotite (Wu & Chen, 2015b), Ti‐in‐muscovite (Wu & Chen, 2015a) and two‐feldspar (Benisek et al, 2010) geothermometers were additionally utilized to estimate the temperature at related metamorphic stages (see Table 1 for detail).…”
Section: Geothermobarometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressures adopted in Ti‐Bt, Ti‐Ms and Two‐feldspar are estimated according to the results in GB+GBPQ, GB+GBAQ and GB+GBMP. References and corresponding random errors/uncertainty (shown as error bars): GB thermometer: Holdaway (2000); ±25°C, GBPQ barometer: Wu et al (2004); ±1.2 kbar, GBAQ barometer: Wu (2017); ±1.8 kbar, GBMP barometer: Wu (2015); ±1.2 kbar, Ti–Bt thermometer: Wu and Chen (2015b); ±50°C, Ti–Ms thermometer: Wu and Chen (2015a); ± 65°C, two‐feldspar geothermometer: Benisek et al (2010), uncertainty of 5%.…”
Section: Geothermobarometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monazite/Garnet 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 - Pressures were estimated using the garnet-aluminosilicate-quartz-plagioclase (GASP) barometer of Holdaway (2001) and the revised garnet-biotite-muscovite-plagioclase barometer (GBMP) of Wu (2017). The absolute uncertainty of the first method is ±0.08 GPa, while that of the second one is ±0.12 GPa.…”
Section: Conventional Thermobarometrymentioning
confidence: 99%