2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of simplified safety formats for structural timber design

Abstract: A framework for calibrating the reliability elements in simplified semi-probabilistic design safety formats is presented. The objective of calibration is to minimize the increase of construction costs, compared to the non-simplified safety format, without reducing the level of structural safety. The framework is utilized for calibrating two simplified safety formats which aim at reducing the number of load combinations relevant in structural timber design. In fact, the load-duration effect makes the design of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation could be resolved by using a probabilistic load combination approach, such as Turkstra's rule or the Ferry Borges Castanheta method. 32 Baravalle 41 and Beck and Souza Jr. 11 demonstrate the probabilistic load combination approach in the context of calibrating the Eurocode and Brazilian design code formulas, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Function and Probabilistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation could be resolved by using a probabilistic load combination approach, such as Turkstra's rule or the Ferry Borges Castanheta method. 32 Baravalle 41 and Beck and Souza Jr. 11 demonstrate the probabilistic load combination approach in the context of calibrating the Eurocode and Brazilian design code formulas, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Function and Probabilistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…might require slightly extended considerations due to possibly significant time-dependent or spatial variability effects; see e.g. [85,86,87,88]. 2.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Presented Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] On the other hand, dimensioning according to Eurocode 5 is complex and generates oversized components by reducing the mechanical properties to characteristic 5% quantile values in combination with additional safety factors. [5][6][7][8] This may be appropriate in wood engineering but does not correspond to the sociopolitical demand for sustainability in mechanical engineering. [9][10][11] Due to its anisotropic structure and a number of influencing factors on the mechanical properties, such as the influence of wood moisture, the calculation of wood-based materials is a more demanding challenge than metallic construction materials with generally isotropic material behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4 ] On the other hand, dimensioning according to Eurocode 5 is complex and generates oversized components by reducing the mechanical properties to characteristic 5% quantile values in combination with additional safety factors. [ 5–8 ] This may be appropriate in wood engineering but does not correspond to the sociopolitical demand for sustainability in mechanical engineering. [ 9–11 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%