2011
DOI: 10.1121/1.3589253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of pressure-velocity probes using a progressive plane wave reference field and comparison with nominal calibration filters

Abstract: A procedure for calibrating pressure-velocity (p-v) sound intensity probes using a progressive plane wave as reference field is presented here. The procedure has been checked for a microelectromechanical system technology-based Microflown(®) match-size probe by comparing the calibration results with the nominal correction curves available from the manufacturer. The reference field was generated along a wave guide by means of a dual cone loudspeaker supplying acoustic energy in the range 20 Hz-20 kHz through an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at very low or high frequencies when the sound field is either strongly active or reactive, the measurement accuracy strongly depends on the accuracy of the phase calibration 22 . Furthermore, the majority of the Microflown calibration reports published so far in the literature are based on measuring intensity in one direction only 19,22,23 .…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, at very low or high frequencies when the sound field is either strongly active or reactive, the measurement accuracy strongly depends on the accuracy of the phase calibration 22 . Furthermore, the majority of the Microflown calibration reports published so far in the literature are based on measuring intensity in one direction only 19,22,23 .…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the majority of the Microflown calibration reports published so far in the literature are based on measuring intensity in one direction only 19,22,23 . The only calibration investigation available for a 'p-u' probe measuring pressure and velocities in three orthogonal directions simultaneously is provided by the manufacturer 17 .…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general calibration process as introduced in [2], can be summarized by means of two calibration functions K and Γ defined in the frequency domain by the two equations:…”
Section: Active and Reactive Calibration Process With Acoustic Wave Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of figure 3 were obtained with a commercially available sound intensity micro-probe which was previously calibrated using a progressive plane wave (PPW) reference field as completely accounted in [3]. The calibration procedure is summarized below for completeness.…”
Section: A Prototype Probe For P-v Tympanometry and Its Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to point out that at present, tympanometric signals are obtained only with a pressure microphone, so no direct measurement of the immittance function of the ear is accomplished: this process would require, in fact, the acquisition of the concatenated air particle velocity signal in addition to the acoustic pressure one. The possibility of using well calibrated p-v sound intensity microprobes [3] has been recently demonstrated by two of the authors of the present paper [5], in connection with recent developments of wide band excitation tympanometry and the concept of Energy Absorbance (EA) [4]. The p-v approach to audiometric measures is possible thanks to the development of MEMS sensors, whose size makes them optimal to be used in such particular applications; it can be safely stated that this approach is the key to discover an entire new horizon to energetic audiometry.…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%