Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-019-0889-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of micro-scaled mechanical parameters of granite based on a bonded-particle model with 2D particle flow code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations of strength tests (uniaxial, biaxial, Brazilian splitting experiments, etc. ) are needed to establish the relationship between model microcosmic parameters and the macroscopic mechanical properties of rocks, such a process is called calibration (Xia et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2019). The particle distribution may have a significant influence on the macroscopic mechanical properties of the model because the change of particle locations will affect the crack initiation and propagation in the rock model.…”
Section: Var(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations of strength tests (uniaxial, biaxial, Brazilian splitting experiments, etc. ) are needed to establish the relationship between model microcosmic parameters and the macroscopic mechanical properties of rocks, such a process is called calibration (Xia et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2019). The particle distribution may have a significant influence on the macroscopic mechanical properties of the model because the change of particle locations will affect the crack initiation and propagation in the rock model.…”
Section: Var(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) The porosity ϕ and the density ρ are two macroscopic indices to describe particle packings. The reported influence factors include the genesis pressure [1], the initial friction coefficient [22] and the mineral or material distribution [33]. The porosity ϕ and the density ρ are important for determining the mechanical behaviour of a bonded particle model but these parameters cannot be directly inputted from simulations.…”
Section: Microscopic Parameters Associated With Macroscopic Strength Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the slightly overlapped particle model, many other methods are also employed to overcome the shortcomings of a circular or spherical particle configuration, such as particle clusters [1,33], rigid particle clumps [65][66][67], stochastic distribution of material properties [68], other bonded particle model [69], and polygonal particles [70].…”
Section: The Acceptable Level Of Calibration Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Advances in Civil Engineering soil mass were represented as the collective action of the microscale strength parameters. erefore, it was necessary to calculate these microstrength parameters in different materials using macro-micro parameter calibration [50]. h 0 is the self-stabilized arch height of coal roadway roof; W is the coal roadway width, and the value is 5.4 m; P 0 is the vertical earth pressure, and the value is P 0 � 64.6 × 0.023 � 1.4858 MPa; σ t is the tensile strength of rock mass, and the tensile strength of the rock masses was estimated to be one-tenth of the compressive strength, so the value is 0.92 MPa; λ is the lateral pressure coefficient, and the value is 0.15; f is the rock firmness coefficient, and the value is 1.46; L is the rib spalling depth; h w is the coal roadway height, and the value is 2.6 m; Φ is the internal friction angle, and the value is 36°.…”
Section: Coal Roadwaymentioning
confidence: 99%