2011
DOI: 10.1118/1.3553407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of helical tomotherapy machine using EPR/alanine dosimetry

Abstract: Beam dose rate estimation results were found to be in good agreement with the reference value given by the manufacturer at 2% standard uncertainty. Moreover, the dose determination method was set up with a deviation around 2% (at a 2% standard uncertainty).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the static beam output was measured in a rectangular solid phantom (except at the Antwerp site), the presence of Virtual Water TM in the "dose to water" derivation in the msrf was studied with MC calculations: at the isocenter placed at 10 cm depth, the use of Virtual Water TM accounts for a factor D w, in SolidWater =D w, in water ¼ 0.995 6 0.003 (1 SD) which contradicts conclusions reported elsewhere. 33 The effect of using a (curved) cylindrical phantom of 10 cm radius accounts for a factor D cyl ph =D rect ph ¼ 0.9975 6 0.003 (1 SD) at the isocenter. Regarding the pcsrf delivery (test C), the measured dose was into accordance with the planned dose D meas =D TPS ¼ 1.002 6 0.015 (1 SD), irrespectively of the beam slit used and contrary to results reported earlier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the static beam output was measured in a rectangular solid phantom (except at the Antwerp site), the presence of Virtual Water TM in the "dose to water" derivation in the msrf was studied with MC calculations: at the isocenter placed at 10 cm depth, the use of Virtual Water TM accounts for a factor D w, in SolidWater =D w, in water ¼ 0.995 6 0.003 (1 SD) which contradicts conclusions reported elsewhere. 33 The effect of using a (curved) cylindrical phantom of 10 cm radius accounts for a factor D cyl ph =D rect ph ¼ 0.9975 6 0.003 (1 SD) at the isocenter. Regarding the pcsrf delivery (test C), the measured dose was into accordance with the planned dose D meas =D TPS ¼ 1.002 6 0.015 (1 SD), irrespectively of the beam slit used and contrary to results reported earlier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the pcsrf delivery (test C), the measured dose was into accordance with the planned dose D meas =D TPS ¼ 1.002 6 0.015 (1 SD), irrespectively of the beam slit used and contrary to results reported earlier. 33 The measurements in Table IV monitor the momentary beam output at each center and its stability is of concern. During a measurement session (short time) in Antwerp, the beam output was found stable within 0.3%; all measurements for a given center were performed within about 2.5 h and, under normal operation, important deviations during this time lapse are not expected, as the measurements in Table IV indicate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LNHB alanine calibration curves had been validated as suitable for use of alanine in nonreference conditions. 12 Uncertainties are calculated for k = 1, using the following expression: 20…”
Section: A3 Calibration Curve D = F (Epr Amplitude)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Moreover, the LNHB has already carried out such studies for innovative radiotherapy techniques like Cyberknife or Tomotherapy. 11,12 Thanks to the shape and dimensions of alanine dosimeters, they can be used for small beams. Alanine dosimeters have interesting advantages: measures are at solid state and nondestructive, their responses are almost independent on the dose rate and energy of radiotherapy photon beams and their signal is stable in time (signal decreases less than 1% per year).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correction factors were obtained by comparing A1SL measurements with alanine dosimetry, provided by the National Physical Laboratory, NPL, and traceable to primary standards, through a postal dosimetry service already used for absolute dosimetry in TomoTherapy. [4][5][6] Finally, the applicability of the new formalism to clinical treatments was investigated with two clinical examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%