1971
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/16/1/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of cavity ionization chambers

Abstract: d commercial thimble ionization chamber, intended for use as a Bragg-Gray cavity chamber a t high photon energies, must be calibrated in such a way that the reading of the instrument can be converted into the " ion dose " in the air volume of the chamber. i.e. the quotient of the ion charge and the mass of air in that volume.The factor for this conversion is independent of the photon energy. A method for this calibration is proposed and measurements of a correction factor are described. The theoretical express… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) The wall correction factor has been discussed by Franz (1971). For 250 kV x-rays with a 1.5 mm copper filter he has shown that kwall = 1.000 for wall thicknesses up to 300mgcm-*.…”
Section: In-air Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) The wall correction factor has been discussed by Franz (1971). For 250 kV x-rays with a 1.5 mm copper filter he has shown that kwall = 1.000 for wall thicknesses up to 300mgcm-*.…”
Section: In-air Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal radius of the secondary standard chamber is 3.6 mm and, if a displacement correction were applied to its reading, a similar correction would have to be made to the reading from the TE chamber which has an internal radius of 4.8 mm, and this would tend to cancel out. Franz (1971) suggested that for measurements in a phantom the centre of measurement should be considered to be displaced by three quarters of the radius of the cavity in front of the centre of the chamber. For the two chambers used, which have a difference of 1.2 mm in their internal radii, the net correction, calculated from depth dose tables, would be 0.997 for a 10 cm x 10 cm field in a 6oCo beam.…”
Section: In-phantom Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%